Anyone here who in the past few days said absolutely this abomination of a ruling by the MAGA judge

would be overturned, please bookmark this thread.

I want to be able to apologize to you and admit how wrong I am with the following prediction:

"Even though the SC has already made a ruling about executive privilege and Trump, that both the 11th Circuit and the SC will find a way to stop or greatly hinder any prosecution of Trump that is based on these documents"

OR

"Any successful conviction of Trump or Kushner or Rudy etal, will be taken to the SC and overturned."

That last one, is that a thing? Can a convicted felon, regardless of the crime, have the conviction overturned by the US Supreme Court regardless of the court they were convicted in? Can they say your constitutional rights were violated or some such thing?



But, if we are right, those of us who see no justice coming because of this, we need to make the point that NOTHING is the same as before. Assuming law and order exists, assuming the rule of law is a thing with the GOP, is a mistake to do. And the last thing we should be doing is poo pooing these type of situations.

But again, I want to be wrong, I do...

How do I make certain the gif or pic I am copy pasting is safe?

I know about the lock, I know about the https vs http, but whenever I google a pic and I click on it I often get warnings from malwarebytes etc. Most of the time I dont, but I also know from past mistakes that I can be risking something.

Other than not doing it, what is the best way to do this?

Thanks!

Lawyers please chime in here...what is the WORST case scenario for justice with a SM?

WHEN not if it is appealed to the 11th circuit and WHEN not if they do not overrule it or maybe they dont even appeal it, between this traitor judge and the SM, can documents that were taken by the FBI showing trump as a traitor or just the act that he took them, can all that be wiped away like it never happened?

Since this type of thing NEVER happens except for trump, how long does this go on?

Is it true the judge doesn't even have jurisdiction?

Told YA so TOLD YOU SO

If the Prez of the United States did a speech about how to deal with terrorists

and terrorism, should the networks ignore it because it is "political?"

I rest my case.

I saw Elvis in Tahoe at Harrah's or Sahara resort, not sure which, I think 1974 and I have a ?

The show I was at, Elvis introduced Lisa Marie in the audience. This was a big deal of course, I think he had just been divorced from Priscilla.

I know it is a long shot, but did anyone else see him in Tahoe around that time?

That was NOT a political speech!

Defeating trump and maga is NOT politics.

When will people understand this?

A political speech talks about who wants to tax the rich more.
A political speech talks about what foreign policy should be.

ETC

Discussing saving us from fascism is not about politics. Unless you consider fascism a viable political party.

Do all major networks execs know they should have carried the speech, of course they do.

But like I have said before due to the mainstream media being labeled "liberal" back in the 60s ever since they have had to treat the Republican Party like the only game in town and give as little attention to the Democrats as possible otherwise they fear they will be called liberal again.

They will keep doing this and we may well perish as a result.

Fortunately YT and social media is as or more important now, so we can HOPE the people who need to see it, do.

Poll: Will Palin concede and when?

WE know the new GOP believes they cant lose elections, ever. So, will she concede and when?

CIA admits to losing dozens of informants around the world: NYT