Lyricalinklines
Lyricalinklines's JournalSuuuurrrre they do.
Ha ha
YES!
Republicans have claimed since 2009 they've their own health care plan. They obstructed their own work as well as that of the country for years because they didn't like who was in office. And now they claim "it's hard to find a way" to give ACCESS. I find it Sickening!
They've nothing locked up until they provide the plan for discussion.
Lines could be blurred, yet needs addressed.
I see your point that the greater good shall be recipients of tax dollars. I think of how many tax dollars are utilized for special interest groups in exchange for monetary support of elections. And how many corporations accept tax dollars in the form of rebates/tax cuts and report continuing record profits. Certainly, those corporations are 'creating jobs' yet at the cost of tax dollars that perhaps could serve the greater good else where - health care perhaps - when their profits can now than provide necessary funds to properly run their business profitably, albeit a lessor profit.
I disagree with the word 'target' usage here since it implies an intent. Intent means I know a group will be subject to effects of such decisions.
I question then the further decrease in taxes on those 1% who use lobbied for loop holes to whittle actual paid taxes to less than that paid by average middle class. When cuts to assist poor occur concurrently in the same budget the logical conclusion is favoring one group over another (this example: wealthy favored over poor) not to mention divisive as well. Therefore, knowing the poor (disabled/elderly) will not be able to access care, thereby knowingly and willingly subjecting an entire population to no future care and the results of lack of necessary future care to restore health.
I see many layers of prejudice, classist even elitism in how Republicans address this issue.
Profile Information
Member since: Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:20 AMNumber of posts: 367
