Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Your fear of MY guns is irrational. None have ever harmed a human or been used in a crime. [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)35. Which is the reason I rec'd it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
129 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your fear of MY guns is irrational. None have ever harmed a human or been used in a crime. [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
OP
That's because VA is a gun worshipping jurisdication, and is right across the river.
Loudly
Jul 2012
#8
Making guns and ammo less prevalent in society isn't really a Constitutional problem.
Loudly
Jul 2012
#11
I'm all for it. Get rid of the Second Amendment. WE don't need it and there is NO OTHER
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#117
Really? Then how do you explain low gun crime rates in countries that DO restrict guns? n/t
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#126
And your dramatic over-reaction is typical of someone who feels threatened by any reasonable amount
Ikonoklast
Jul 2012
#71
In parts of this community, one had better keep his/her weapons well-hidden, else some burglar or
indepat
Jul 2012
#100
Clara Harris had a drivers license and had never harmed a single person with her Mercedes.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
#12
Interestingly enough, more people are killed by drivers than people with guns every year. Oh shi
Edweird
Jul 2012
#89
You're afraid of the OP in particular and you claim you're being rational? (nt)
Posteritatis
Jul 2012
#51
My issue is with gun laws and what is available for sale. These laws and what is available need to
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#92
I imagine there were a number of soft drinks being consumed in the theater that night.
blue neen
Jul 2012
#13
The same processes that allowed you to obtain your firearms also allowed James Holmes to obtain his.
baldguy
Jul 2012
#16
OP has stated he is in favor of background checks and restrictions on high capacity magazines
Kaleva
Jul 2012
#26
I don't agree with entire OPs when I rec them but if I see something is progressive I do.
freshwest
Jul 2012
#60
According to what Skinner told the hosts, threads like these will be allowed in GD for awhile yet
Kaleva
Jul 2012
#68
I enjoy the HELL out of my life, even on those rare occasions when I'm buying ammo.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
#23
One could say the same here for those who advocate for the banning of all semi-autos
Kaleva
Jul 2012
#78
Your assumption that regulating gun ownership equates to "irrational fear of YOUR gun"
shcrane71
Jul 2012
#39
Your fear of MY nuclear weapons is irrational. None have ever harmed a human or been used in a crime
drm604
Jul 2012
#56
"a paranoid gun nut who will probably go along with any NRA opposition to these things"? HUH?
Zalatix
Jul 2012
#118
I'm tired of trashing threads on GD. Can we get all I am a gun owner posts out of the way at once?
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#125