Handguns, Shotguns, Rifles, okay

[ProgressiveProfessor]

12. If you had stated just that, it would have been fine

But instead you declared that owning an AR format rifle was compensating and threw in the invalid need canard.

100 rd mags (or any snail drum type) is nothing more than unreliable bling. No one competent would even consider using one. I have a snail drum magazine that I use as an example of what not to buy in the firearms classes I teach.

The .223 Remington existed before it was modified slightly for military purposes. It was not designed to kill humans en masse. It was a light target and hunting round.

The real issue is if the shooter is a threat to society. If they are not, who cares if they have a ridiculous and unreliable magazine. If they are, they should have no firearms at all.

I don't own an AR, I have a Mini-14 and its a working rifle, not an object of worship. Lives in a scabbard on the ATV when I am out on my property. However, functionally it is indistinguishable from an AR. What am I compensating for?