Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Princess Michael of Kent wears racist brooch to lunch with Meghan Markle [View all]
http://www.elle.com/culture/a14485306/princess-michael-of-kent-racist-brooch/?src=nl&mag=elm&list=nl_elm_news&date=122217"When Meghan Markle attended the Queen's Christmas luncheon this week at Buckingham Palace, she joined about 50 members of the royal family at the gathering, from Prince William and Kate Middleton, to Prince Harry's cousins Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice. And while the former actress mingled with extended members of her fiancé's family, not all first impressions were as to be expected.
Princess Michael of Kentwife of Prince Michael of Kent, Queen Elizabeth II's first cousinwas also there, wearing an incredibly offensive brooch on her coat while arriving to the palace with her husband. The accessory is a piece of blackamoor jewelryan ebony figurine which, despite the ornate gold clothing, is usually depicted in a positions of servitude, such as carrying plates of food or waiting on someone.
Some might argue that European renditions of blackamoor art depicted black figures as noblemen, but mostly this isn't actually the case. These blackamoor figures, frequently spotted in Italian art and European jewelry from the Middle Ages onwards, were a response to the European encounter of "the Moors"darker skinned people from North Africa and the Middle East. The gaudy figures are arguably meant to emphasize the strange and exotic "otherness" of people with dark skin, fetishizing these races and glorifying their enslavement. It is this emphasis of "Otherness," which is exactly what Meghan Markle herself railed against in her essay for ELLE UK, entitled 'I Am More Than An "Other."'
Blackamoor jewellery and art is considered dated, racially insensitive, and even taboo today. Dolce & Gabbana caused an uproar in 2012 when it included blackamoor heads on a pair of earrings and on fabric prints in its Spring 2013 collection.
It's unclear whether the princess wore the brooch to intentionally make an offensive statement, or whether it was a clueless decision wear the tone-deaf accessory. But to wear it at allespecially at an event where a celebrated biracial duchess-to-be would attendis simply inappropriate.
What's more, Princess "Mike" (as she's called) has a history of racism. In 2004, she reportedly told a group of black customers in a West Village, NYC restaurant to "go back to the colonies" after she complained that they were being noisy.".....(more)
?crop=1xw:1.0xh;center,top&resize=480:
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Princess Michael of Kent wears racist brooch to lunch with Meghan Markle [View all]
Tanuki
Dec 2017
OP
Harry seems like a cool dude. Neither him or William or Prince Charles seem to even
Blue_true
Dec 2017
#28
If intentional, Meghan would do well to ignore her. She's old and washed up.The youth are England's
politicaljunkie41910
Dec 2017
#14
It's not her fault. She was in a pinch. She reached for her Gollywog brooch, but it was packed away.
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2017
#15
A Nazi "three years before Hitler came to power" - her father was a racist piece of shit
dalton99a
Dec 2017
#29