Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Tanuki

(16,481 posts)
Fri Dec 22, 2017, 04:27 PM Dec 2017

Princess Michael of Kent wears racist brooch to lunch with Meghan Markle [View all]

http://www.elle.com/culture/a14485306/princess-michael-of-kent-racist-brooch/?src=nl&mag=elm&list=nl_elm_news&date=122217

"When Meghan Markle attended the Queen's Christmas luncheon this week at Buckingham Palace, she joined about 50 members of the royal family at the gathering, from Prince William and Kate Middleton, to Prince Harry's cousins Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice. And while the former actress mingled with extended members of her fiancé's family, not all first impressions were as to be expected.


Princess Michael of Kent—wife of Prince Michael of Kent, Queen Elizabeth II's first cousin—was also there, wearing an incredibly offensive brooch on her coat while arriving to the palace with her husband. The accessory is a piece of blackamoor jewelry—an ebony figurine which, despite the ornate gold clothing, is usually depicted in a positions of servitude, such as carrying plates of food or waiting on someone.


Some might argue that European renditions of blackamoor art depicted black figures as noblemen, but mostly this isn't actually the case. These blackamoor figures, frequently spotted in Italian art and European jewelry from the Middle Ages onwards, were a response to the European encounter of "the Moors"—darker skinned people from North Africa and the Middle East. The gaudy figures are arguably meant to emphasize the strange and exotic "otherness" of people with dark skin, fetishizing these races and glorifying their enslavement. It is this emphasis of "Otherness," which is exactly what Meghan Markle herself railed against in her essay for ELLE UK, entitled 'I Am More Than An "Other."'

Blackamoor jewellery and art is considered dated, racially insensitive, and even taboo today. Dolce & Gabbana caused an uproar in 2012 when it included blackamoor heads on a pair of earrings and on fabric prints in its Spring 2013 collection.

It's unclear whether the princess wore the brooch to intentionally make an offensive statement, or whether it was a clueless decision wear the tone-deaf accessory. But to wear it at all—especially at an event where a celebrated biracial duchess-to-be would attend—is simply inappropriate.

What's more, Princess "Mike" (as she's called) has a history of racism. In 2004, she reportedly told a group of black customers in a West Village, NYC restaurant to "go back to the colonies" after she complained that they were being noisy.".....(more)




?crop=1xw:1.0xh;center,top&resize=480:


32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brooch experts everywhere are beside themselves. Sneederbunk Dec 2017 #1
Probably not, but people who care about racism might be bothered. bettyellen Dec 2017 #6
Welcome to the Family Meghan. Not too late to back out. nt Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #2
Harry seems like a cool dude. Neither him or William or Prince Charles seem to even Blue_true Dec 2017 #28
I think Prince Charles is a bit stuffy and may care. But after Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #30
Inasmuch as the brooch does not even match her earrings OldHippieChick Dec 2017 #3
A Brit dog whistle, betcha. Girard442 Dec 2017 #5
" a history of racism".... dixiegrrrrl Dec 2017 #19
That's some nasty imperialistic crap right there. MineralMan Dec 2017 #4
Conservative Elitism MagickMuffin Dec 2017 #7
Wow. Somebody is desperate for attention. GoCubsGo Dec 2017 #8
Bitchy through and through and she can't proclaim it any louder. nt Doremus Dec 2017 #9
Shameful. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2017 #10
Go back to the colonies? kwassa Dec 2017 #11
I hope Harry and the Queen told her off. Demtexan Dec 2017 #12
The queen MFM008 Dec 2017 #13
If intentional, Meghan would do well to ignore her. She's old and washed up.The youth are England's politicaljunkie41910 Dec 2017 #14
It's not her fault. She was in a pinch. She reached for her Gollywog brooch, but it was packed away. TheBlackAdder Dec 2017 #15
Why any sane person thinks marrying into that lot is a good idea malaise Dec 2017 #16
Harry seems like a good human being and a cool dude. PdxSean Dec 2017 #26
Broaching the brooch breach Achilleaze Dec 2017 #17
Princess Michael's father was SS officer muriel_volestrangler Dec 2017 #18
Oh my..... dixiegrrrrl Dec 2017 #21
A Nazi "three years before Hitler came to power" - her father was a racist piece of shit dalton99a Dec 2017 #29
Lovely woman ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #20
I am surprised she did not use the "some of my household staff..." bit. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2017 #22
Yep, I was thinking about Mrs Moore as I read this ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #23
Best revenge. Kick them out of Kensington apt and cally Dec 2017 #24
she's always been a fairly horrible person renate Dec 2017 #25
How are we to treat the Others? Nictuku Dec 2017 #27
Ew. Well, Merkel is still going to a Princess of the realm ismnotwasm Dec 2017 #31
OMG! rusty fender Dec 2017 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Princess Michael of Kent ...