Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Your fear of MY guns is irrational. None have ever harmed a human or been used in a crime. [View all]Zalatix
(8,994 posts)118. "a paranoid gun nut who will probably go along with any NRA opposition to these things"? HUH?
Where did you get that from?
I am NOT a member of the NRA and the ONLY thing I know about NRA talking points is what I read from the most vocal anti-gun folks. I wouldn't know an NRA talking point if you hit me with it. In fact, I don't think the NRA has nearly as much pull as most anti-gun people believe it does.
I do not believe civilian ownership of 100 round magazines should be allowed. In fact, I don't see the need for rifles to carry more rounds than semi-automatic handguns.
I believe everyone purchasing a handgun should endure a background check, no matter where the purchase takes place.
I believe purchasing a handgun from a private party should require the seller to be responsible for its registration. Should the seller NOT register the sale, the seller should be held equally responsible for whatever illegal act the purchaser might commit with it.
I don't think all gun owners have little dicks, or even little boobies, nor do I think they are all paranoid.
I don't believe concealed carry would be a problem if there were a standardized set of requirements nationwide, including psychological tests, safety training, and requiring a person to prove they can shoot accurately.
I believe everyone purchasing a handgun should endure a background check, no matter where the purchase takes place.
I believe purchasing a handgun from a private party should require the seller to be responsible for its registration. Should the seller NOT register the sale, the seller should be held equally responsible for whatever illegal act the purchaser might commit with it.
I don't think all gun owners have little dicks, or even little boobies, nor do I think they are all paranoid.
I don't believe concealed carry would be a problem if there were a standardized set of requirements nationwide, including psychological tests, safety training, and requiring a person to prove they can shoot accurately.
These are laws that the NRA HATES.
Show me how those are NRA talking points. Oh and "Paranoid gun nut" is downright insulting, and in this case, extremely wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
129 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your fear of MY guns is irrational. None have ever harmed a human or been used in a crime. [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
OP
That's because VA is a gun worshipping jurisdication, and is right across the river.
Loudly
Jul 2012
#8
Making guns and ammo less prevalent in society isn't really a Constitutional problem.
Loudly
Jul 2012
#11
I'm all for it. Get rid of the Second Amendment. WE don't need it and there is NO OTHER
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#117
Really? Then how do you explain low gun crime rates in countries that DO restrict guns? n/t
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#126
And your dramatic over-reaction is typical of someone who feels threatened by any reasonable amount
Ikonoklast
Jul 2012
#71
In parts of this community, one had better keep his/her weapons well-hidden, else some burglar or
indepat
Jul 2012
#100
Clara Harris had a drivers license and had never harmed a single person with her Mercedes.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
#12
Interestingly enough, more people are killed by drivers than people with guns every year. Oh shi
Edweird
Jul 2012
#89
You're afraid of the OP in particular and you claim you're being rational? (nt)
Posteritatis
Jul 2012
#51
My issue is with gun laws and what is available for sale. These laws and what is available need to
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#92
I imagine there were a number of soft drinks being consumed in the theater that night.
blue neen
Jul 2012
#13
The same processes that allowed you to obtain your firearms also allowed James Holmes to obtain his.
baldguy
Jul 2012
#16
OP has stated he is in favor of background checks and restrictions on high capacity magazines
Kaleva
Jul 2012
#26
I don't agree with entire OPs when I rec them but if I see something is progressive I do.
freshwest
Jul 2012
#60
According to what Skinner told the hosts, threads like these will be allowed in GD for awhile yet
Kaleva
Jul 2012
#68
I enjoy the HELL out of my life, even on those rare occasions when I'm buying ammo.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
#23
One could say the same here for those who advocate for the banning of all semi-autos
Kaleva
Jul 2012
#78
Your assumption that regulating gun ownership equates to "irrational fear of YOUR gun"
shcrane71
Jul 2012
#39
Your fear of MY nuclear weapons is irrational. None have ever harmed a human or been used in a crime
drm604
Jul 2012
#56
"a paranoid gun nut who will probably go along with any NRA opposition to these things"? HUH?
Zalatix
Jul 2012
#118
I'm tired of trashing threads on GD. Can we get all I am a gun owner posts out of the way at once?
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#125