Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,247 posts)
60. It was alarming enough to the club owner, who does deal with males of that age group,
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 09:55 PM
Jul 2012

to ban him from the club.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

People should do it SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #1
We have a reporting requirement for child molesters. pnwmom Jul 2012 #2
I can't imagine anyone not reporting child molestation SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #6
How about owners of gun clubs, gun stores, and other professionals pnwmom Jul 2012 #7
Based on a voicemail or an e-mail signature? SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #9
Why not based on a crazy voicemail? pnwmom Jul 2012 #13
In the story I read, he wasn't banned from the club SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #18
There's obviously more than one story, and more than one interpretation. n/t pnwmom Jul 2012 #97
How many college guys have doofy voicemails? obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #22
But why would these "business" people turn in their best customer? 99th_Monkey Jul 2012 #38
Unless they are priests or football coaches, of course. IdaBriggs Jul 2012 #105
Or the Soviet Union. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jul 2012 #5
So, what would be your workable suggestions? blue neen Jul 2012 #23
You mean other than dropping the dime on someone who mentions guns on a street corner? cherokeeprogressive Jul 2012 #35
The OP made a suggestion, not an out and out black and white statement. blue neen Jul 2012 #45
And can you imagine how people would report others as a joke or maybe out of meanness of JDPriestly Jul 2012 #101
What would be the difference in Colorado, since it prohibits registration and has no permits frazzled Jul 2012 #3
A person can be committed involuntarily for a period of psychiatric examination pnwmom Jul 2012 #10
Hindsight is 20/20 SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #12
Why wouldn't that depend on what the voice message SAID? pnwmom Jul 2012 #15
I guess if he said SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #20
Yup obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #27
The range owner had nothing to report hiom for obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #28
Colorado has a NCIS check, a State check, and a mental health check obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #26
But that doesn't preclude him from having been showing signs of a disturbance pnwmom Jul 2012 #112
Amen. I keep thinking about his parents. isuphighyeah Jul 2012 #4
They probably knew he was troubled. They probably BEGGED for help for years. kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #8
If the gun club guy who rejected him had also reported him, pnwmom Jul 2012 #11
LOL. A garbled message on an answering machine isn't remotely kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #14
Depends on the court. I know someone who was involuntarily committed pnwmom Jul 2012 #17
It is VERY VERY DIFFICULT obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #33
Too early to tell. I bet there turns out to be a history. n/t pnwmom Jul 2012 #94
There isn't, or he couldn't have bought the handguns obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #107
He didn't reject him at all -- the article doesn't say that obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #31
The alarming voicemail message in combination with the application to the gun club pnwmom Jul 2012 #57
It's only "alarming" if you don't deal with males of that age group. LisaL Jul 2012 #58
It was alarming enough to the club owner, who does deal with males of that age group, pnwmom Jul 2012 #60
He didn't ban him. LisaL Jul 2012 #62
Yes he did, according to the article. Here: pnwmom Jul 2012 #64
Eventually, because Mr. Holmes never responded to his messages. LisaL Jul 2012 #66
That is your interpretation. The point is that the voicemail message pnwmom Jul 2012 #68
I've already linked to another article SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #73
So? He could have said different things in different interviews. pnwmom Jul 2012 #75
In combination, it's obvious he never met with Holmes, and Holmes never responded to his LisaL Jul 2012 #79
Detroit News: "Rotkovich said he told his employees Holmes was not allowed on the premises." pnwmom Jul 2012 #95
I've posted the link in three different places on this thread SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #82
Not only the owner never met him, Holmes never called him back despite 3 messages left on his LisaL Jul 2012 #83
And yet, according to the Detroit News, the owner says he banned him from the premises. pnwmom Jul 2012 #98
It doesn't matter whether he met Holmes. He made the decision, eventually, pnwmom Jul 2012 #96
Alarming? SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #59
No, the article said the employees were instructed not to accept him. Here: pnwmom Jul 2012 #63
I said the article I read SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #71
Reported him for what? LisaL Jul 2012 #44
For whatever he said or did that alarmed the club owner enough to ban him. pnwmom Jul 2012 #65
Another article that quotes the owner SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #74
What other article? pnwmom Jul 2012 #77
That's my point. People seem to think that you call the authorities kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #90
Reported him to WHO? Marrah_G Jul 2012 #51
We should. That's part of the point that I'm making. n/t pnwmom Jul 2012 #69
He wasn't rejected n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #53
Yes, he was. Why do people keep insisting this? pnwmom Jul 2012 #67
Because another article contradicts what the article you're using claims SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #76
That doesn't contradict the article I posted. pnwmom Jul 2012 #78
Yeah right SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #85
Because the owner himself said he wasn't rejected obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #86
So true. blue neen Jul 2012 #19
There is absolutely nothing to suggest that this was the case. LisaL Jul 2012 #47
The parents and the University have clammed up. pnwmom Jul 2012 #70
The gun club owner didn't ban him obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #87
From the Detroit News: "Rotkovich said he told his employees Holmes was not allowed on the premises. pnwmom Jul 2012 #93
There was absolutely nothing to suggest that my mom was psychotic kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #91
What were they supposed to alert on? LisaL Jul 2012 #49
Which "someone" would they call? oldhippie Jul 2012 #110
I'd have to report every repuke! L0oniX Jul 2012 #16
What you are saying is hype and not true. blue neen Jul 2012 #21
What ever ...so what ...I didn't add the sarcasm tag. L0oniX Jul 2012 #24
Whatever...so what...and just not necessary. blue neen Jul 2012 #29
Net nanny much? L0oniX Jul 2012 #32
(I giggled) obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #34
The victims and their families aren't laughing now. blue neen Jul 2012 #41
I really don't understand why you are so hostile to a joke about the GOP obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #54
How did you know? blue neen Jul 2012 #40
Maybe you should alert on me if you are so upset. L0oniX Jul 2012 #42
I'm not upset. blue neen Jul 2012 #48
Thanks for the advise to alert on myself. L0oniX Jul 2012 #52
I think this is treading in extremely dangerous territory obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #25
Yup. woo me with science Jul 2012 #30
Indeed obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #36
Democrats would be reporting Republicans and Republicans reporting Democrats. former9thward Jul 2012 #37
I am sure that woudl work out well. geckosfeet Jul 2012 #39
I love that smilie! obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #55
I'm not big on using smilies but sometimes you just have to give in. geckosfeet Jul 2012 #103
Over what? LisaL Jul 2012 #43
DHS Report Suspicious Activity jody Jul 2012 #46
And then what? Marrah_G Jul 2012 #50
That is already being "suggested" by some authorities. TouchOfGray Jul 2012 #56
A garbled voice message is not suspicious SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #61
It didn't say "garbled." pnwmom Jul 2012 #72
Well, I'll post this for the fourth time since you keep insisting he was banned SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #80
He didn't say it in the LATimes article, but he didn't exclude it as having happened LATER. pnwmom Jul 2012 #84
Sorry, but I"m not buying that SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #88
"Rotkovich said he told his employees Holmes was not allowed on the premises." pnwmom Jul 2012 #92
There was no subsequent behavior because Holmes never responded to his messages LisaL Jul 2012 #81
That would include about half my neighborhood NNN0LHI Jul 2012 #89
What could possibly go wrong? HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #99
Assault rifles, easily available to crazy people: what could possibly go wrong? nt pnwmom Jul 2012 #100
Assault rifles are NOT easily available to people obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #106
It used to be harder when the Assault Weapons Ban was still in effect. pnwmom Jul 2012 #111
I see no way in which this would be abused Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #102
Oh that will get really stupid real quick, MadHound Jul 2012 #104
I know of one who has the potential to be an extreme mass murderer. Zorra Jul 2012 #108
Yeah, let's give the Religious Right the power to report 'suspected disturbed individuals' to cops. Bluenorthwest Jul 2012 #109
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe there should be a r...»Reply #60