Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Time to be "Well Regulated"? [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)38. Your post is confusing ...
as you stated:
"Then there are guns that shot far deadly concealable to be of any use except to kill people at a bar fight or stick up the local convenience store."
I assume you are saying that some handguns are far too small and compact and consequently can be easily concealed and used to kill innocent people.
It is true that criminals often use such firearms but it is also true that many citizens are licensed to carry concealed weapons in our nation. In Florida, for example, over 800,000 people living in the state have a concealed weapons permit. Many chose to carry small, light and compact handguns as in the heat of Florida where a jacket is usually worn only on a few days in the colder winter months, these weapons are easier to conceal. Florida law requires your legal weapon to be concealed except for a brief inadvertent flash such as when a person was walking in a parking lot and a gust of wind lifted his jacket.
I personally carry a 5 shot S&W .38 caliber snub nosed revolver in my pants pocket. In the 15 years or so that I have carried it, not one person that I walked past or talked to on the street knew that I was armed. That includes police officers that I had conversations with.
If I planned to get into a bar fight or stick up a store, I would carry a larger handgun that holds far more rounds. Since I have absolutely no intention to ever do something as stupid as that and since I carry this weapon because of the extremely unlikely possibility that I would have reason to use it to saved my life or my health, I wish to carry the smallest and lightest handgun that I can find that will be an adequate self defense weapon.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Getting rid of the '86 ban on new manufacture of fully automatic weapons would be a good start.
Johnny Rico
Jul 2012
#4
Your link is from a satire site. You're not exactly covering yourself in credibility, here.
Johnny Rico
Jul 2012
#26
Legal owners of machine guns are the most responsible, law abiding gun owners
Johnny Rico
Jul 2012
#19
Sure. Repeal the '86 machine gun ban, '68 Gun Control Act, and '34 Gun Control Act.
Johnny Rico
Jul 2012
#40
So, your position is basically identical to the most extreme RW policies of the NRA.
baldguy
Jul 2012
#48
Responsibility is a liberal value, too. It's sickeningly fascinating how RW extremists always avoid it.
baldguy
Jul 2012
#59
Mine are sufficiently regulated. I don't need any help from you or anyone else.
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#7
Yes please. I want to make enough money to get away from people like you,
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2012
#42
It's my belief that any honest reading of the 2nd Amendment renders ALL Federal firearm regulations
Llewlladdwr
Jul 2012
#29
Any honest reading of the Second Amendment wouldn't ignore the first part of the sentence.
AndyA
Jul 2012
#31
The Militia is mentioned because the neccessity for one is the reason the right of the people to
Llewlladdwr
Jul 2012
#44