Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OK - So let's say we repeal the second amendment. [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)59. Funny but I just had a discussion with my son in law about the proper use of the terms ...
clip and magazine.
I find it sad that many experienced shooters call a magazine a clip.
Another example is the difference between a bullet and a cartridge.
For terminology questions, I prefer the NRA Firearms Sourcebook. This outstanding effort on the part of the American Rifleman Technical staff tells us that a bullet is a non-spherical projectile for use in a rifled barrel... and a cartridge is a single round of ammunition consisting of case, primer and propellant with one or more projectiles. In other words, a bullet is the part of a cartridge that goes sailing downrange to do its work. The terms are not interchangeable and should be used for their specific and individual meanings.
http://www.americanrifleman.org/blogs/bullets-and-cartridges/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perversion? How would ammunition not fall under the umbrella of "arms"? nt
OneTenthofOnePercent
Jul 2012
#65
A couple of generations down the line will curse your name for demolishing what was
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2012
#41
many people believe there is no solution possible because there is no solution in sight.
LanternWaste
Jul 2012
#63
'Cause WW1 proved bolt action rifles are incapable of killing large numbers of people.
Ready4Change
Jul 2012
#15
Funny but I just had a discussion with my son in law about the proper use of the terms ...
spin
Jul 2012
#59
Yeah, but Andy would be smart enough to keep Barney's battery in his pocket along with the bullet.
Fumesucker
Jul 2012
#29
What's To Keep The King Of England From Coming Into Your House And Pushing You Around?
ChoppinBroccoli
Jul 2012
#22
"Allow people handguns with short magazines and bolt action rifles." stopped reading there
JVS
Jul 2012
#27
Actually, it'd be as simple as classing guns along with any other sort of property
Scootaloo
Jul 2012
#32
Gee, if they're fine, upstanding, law-abiding citizens wouldn't the owners turn them in?
baldguy
Jul 2012
#47
If the law changes, and they don't turn their weapons in, they've made themselves criminals.
baldguy
Jul 2012
#54