Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,489 posts)
55. Huge problem, and it's international, and I'm a dreamer.
Mon Jan 1, 2018, 07:31 PM
Jan 2018

The basic thing that allows so few to control the minds of so many is money. "Follow the money", as they say. For many decades, profits from our daily routine purchases have trickled upwards into the coffers of billionaires such as the Waltons, Koches and Murdochs, and these people in turn use those funds against us in hundreds of ways that originated from our paychecks, savings and retirement funds.

I'm convinced that until the public is willing to inflict some serious pain on these corporations, this situation will only worsen. Translated, a large percentage of the public would have to sacrifice some pleasure and consumerist habits for a while, and either strike against or boycott a select group of these corporations until their quarterly earnings were tanked. In other words, force Wall Street to yield and pay attention.

For example, if half the American public swore to not enter a Walmart for a year, or if several million people dropped all services from AT&T as a boycott, that might get some of the upper crust to listen. However, a single non-political organization would be needed to table the demands such as stopping funding of outfits such as ALEC and Heritage Foundation.

That to me, is the only way to reverse this corrosive trend. I doubt if a deep recession or even a mild depression would do the trick because these people are deeply hedged against losses, and they own tremendous amounts of capital around the globe as their safety net.

There are currently several small organizations that are doing this - such as a boycott of Koch-brand products and of Limbaugh's advertisers - but they are too piecemeal to have a big-punch effect.

I would also love to see a hostile takeover of News Corp by a group that would turn their cable feeds into cartoon and educational channels.

Yes. elleng Dec 2017 #1
No. Its NOT Trump propaganda. Komrade Mango is a latecomer... JHB Dec 2017 #2
So you think we should just keep explaining it in multi paragraph length lunatica Dec 2017 #5
Trump is the Party, and the Party is Trump. JHB Dec 2017 #19
I'm not criticizing you lunatica Dec 2017 #25
And I'm not criticizing what you're trying to do... JHB Dec 2017 #29
Agreed, we must recognize that the GOP will... zaj Dec 2017 #31
Yes. Weld the Republican & Trump brands together. Tight. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #45
The second McCarthy Era predates Donald Trump. I see your point but here is how I look at it: StevieM Dec 2017 #20
There is a danger though to naming it after him Crash2Parties Dec 2017 #36
I'm becoming convinced you and other responders are right about this lunatica Dec 2017 #39
Totally agreed. The problem is the GOP. Donald Trump is just a symptom. (eom) StevieM Dec 2017 #17
One word to describe this atmosphere? BigmanPigman Dec 2017 #3
One word can be used to identify this particular use of propaganda lunatica Dec 2017 #9
Josef Goebbels WOULD be proud thbobby Dec 2017 #4
Oh I'm quite sure we'll be KPN Dec 2017 #40
What I learned from Steve Bannon is that anyone can get lucky Cary Dec 2017 #6
I don't think luck played any part in what has happened lunatica Dec 2017 #12
Let me know when these same pieces all fall into place again Cary Dec 2017 #28
Drop it man. KPN Dec 2017 #41
Drop what? Cary Dec 2017 #44
BS. You know exactly what I mean. KPN Jan 2018 #48
I have no recollection of you. Cary Jan 2018 #49
That's your response? KPN Jan 2018 #56
If this were 2016 I might take that shtick more seriously Cary Jan 2018 #57
The purpose of propaganda is to control the mind... kentuck Dec 2017 #7
It's BEEN working, for a LONG TIME, elleng Dec 2017 #10
I'm trying to address it here lunatica Dec 2017 #14
Yes, and thanks. elleng Dec 2017 #16
Yes. lunatica Dec 2017 #13
Yikes, it's TP all over again! 2naSalit Dec 2017 #8
? lunatica Dec 2017 #11
I was going off 2naSalit Dec 2017 #21
Right. No upgrades to the Bush-Off machine (HT to Driftglass with apologies to Dr. Suess) JHB Dec 2017 #24
Thanks for explaining lunatica Dec 2017 #27
No problem... 2naSalit Dec 2017 #47
REPUBLICAN PROPAGANDA pangaia Dec 2017 #15
Yep. lunatica Dec 2017 #18
Precisely. JHB Dec 2017 #22
There ya go! Squinch Dec 2017 #30
The Fox Era blaze Dec 2017 #23
Your choice of that name should definitely go down in American History lunatica Dec 2017 #26
It is political vandalism, an inFOXicated bender... JHB Dec 2017 #32
Rage is highly addictive lunatica Dec 2017 #33
Boy, howdy! JHB Dec 2017 #34
Call it "GOPaganda" Mr. Ected Dec 2017 #35
That's a very good name lunatica Dec 2017 #37
I was going to post the same thing. world wide wally Dec 2017 #42
Goebbels was a master, and repugs are following his play book captain queeg Dec 2017 #38
Trumpaganda Donkees Dec 2017 #43
That's a very good term to use lunatica Jan 2018 #51
How about "Trumpaganda?" I agree we need lexington filly Dec 2017 #46
I like Trumpaganda a lot lunatica Jan 2018 #50
Trumpaganda! quartz007 Jan 2018 #52
You're the 3rd person who came up with that name and I like it a lot! lunatica Jan 2018 #53
We're way beyond propaganda.... Blue_Tires Jan 2018 #54
Huge problem, and it's international, and I'm a dreamer. KY_EnviroGuy Jan 2018 #55
I call it "Fox Pravda". Initech Jan 2018 #58
Its a good descriptive term lunatica Jan 2018 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's start calling it wh...»Reply #55