Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Gentleperson's Guide To Forum Spies [View all]mkultra
(8,907 posts)18. i doubt it
The orginal poster indicated that it was shareable. Not official fair use. Feel free to try and get this post taken down by claiming otherwise.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
191 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It shouldn't be ignored. But we should discuss how to avoid false positives, since those,
patrice
Jul 2012
#94
Do you people really think you're that important? Who really cares what is posted? lol
xtraxritical
Jul 2012
#83
I bookmarked it first thing. I'm so sick of these tactics on DU that I could scream.
loudsue
Jul 2012
#37
IS there a technique that involves putting up posts that take three hours to read?
CBGLuthier
Jul 2012
#3
I wouldn't have offered constructive criticism except for your post about too heavy to lift..
Fumesucker
Jul 2012
#63
If you want to see this in action, just go check out some of the recent gun threads.
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#9
The term "false positive" and witch hunt comes to mind. At least to mine. NT
Democracyinkind
Jul 2012
#21
Given news articles on "sock puppet" governmental agents on the internet over the past year or so,
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#25
Democracyinkind is not damning. S/he's raising legitimate PROCESS questions. You are the one
patrice
Jul 2012
#88
The point is: Apply this list to a hypothetical case of suspected disruption, how do you do that?
patrice
Jul 2012
#97
I do not disagree. I do not agree either. Let's just say I'll be skeptical of all positions.
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#104
I've seen this on other sites. The caveat was that it had to be posted in it's entirety
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#27
it's all nicked from various sources over the years, such as Ron Paul forums
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2012
#60
Parts 2 and 3 by H. Michael Sweeney - gives permission to reprint in whole with author's
leveymg
Jul 2012
#81
Yes, really. All the things you just noted had a point to them. You and I wouldnt have done them
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#178
Thank you for posting this - good, useful information that all DUers should be familiar with
leveymg
Jul 2012
#31
Here's an excellent bedside book: Christopher Simpson's, "The Science of Coercion"
leveymg
Jul 2012
#75
Not safe enough! I've pasted a printout over the right side of my screen so it's always fresh
petronius
Jul 2012
#86
Quite so. I think the worst thing you can do to the 'other side' is get them all suspicious of each
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#138
I'm certainly willing to entertain offers of large sums of money to post on the internet.
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#147
Too long; where's the part where you make people distrust everything on the forum?
bluedigger
Jul 2012
#35
But, I have no doubt the NRA, the nuclear power industry, and other astroturfers do.
leveymg
Jul 2012
#52
Yep. Thanks. That's the book on corporate hacks and the Anti-Social Justice Movement.
Zorra
Jul 2012
#100
Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING' - LOL my response is completely outside their box.
Zalatix
Jul 2012
#129
... and thus people attribute negative changes to communities as a naturally entropic phenomenon
NuttyFluffers
Jul 2012
#145
Let's assume BBI was an 'agent'. What do you think they accomplished on behalf of whomever
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#179