Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Bill Aims To Get Rid Of Paperless Voting Machines [View all]TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)31. there are plenty of dems who apparently think the present counting system is fine; if you are not
not aware of that, you have not been paying attention.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
thank you; you have to wonder why some people are so determined to keep the vote counting process
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2018
#36
you have no idea what you are talking about; clearly YOU couldn't hack those machines, but i think
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2018
#35
i have done vote total comparisons from county clerks to state results and
questionseverything
Jan 2018
#25
ok, i'm not a computer expert, and i don't think you are either, but here is the $64K question,
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2018
#34
It's a trivial problem if it's done at the central processor level instead of in voting machines.
hedda_foil
Jan 2018
#42
how are you going to find evidence of machine hacking when it is never investigated? and no one is
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2018
#37
why do you have such a problem with citizens wanting to oversee their own elections?
questionseverything
Jan 2018
#11
I didn't respond to the OP; I responded to a comment about vote flipping...
brooklynite
Jan 2018
#18
regardless of your arguments, computerized voting equipment does NOT meet the burden of proof that
diva77
Jan 2018
#38
Wouldve been nice if they listened to us in 2007 when there was a lot less at stake
Tiggeroshii
Jan 2018
#3
It would have been nicer if they'd listened in 2003, when they passed out the HAVA dough.
hedda_foil
Jan 2018
#43
i am refering to posters here at du, which if i understand the rules i am not allowed to name
questionseverything
Jan 2018
#16
there are plenty of dems who apparently think the present counting system is fine; if you are not
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2018
#31
Not realizing there is a problem is VERY different than opposing a paper ballots bill.
SunSeeker
Jan 2018
#39
the 1st response and the 4th response in this thread seem to oppose
questionseverything
Jan 2018
#45
hand-counting votes does not require/imply a direct democracy. but yes, many would oppose having
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2018
#49