Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

NickB79

(20,294 posts)

3. 2 million dead? Only off by 98 million or so

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Sat Jan 6, 2018, 08:11 PM

Jan 2018

Even a limited nuclear exchange of a few dozen warheads would be enough to trigger crop failures for several years afterwards as global temps fall and rainfall patterns are disrupted. That would kill off far more people than the actual bombs would.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This is how nuclear war with North Korea would unfold [View all] RandySF Jan 2018 OP

That gave me goosebumps. dewsgirl Jan 2018 #1

Im a devoted fan of his podcast RandySF Jan 2018 #2

2 million dead? Only off by 98 million or so NickB79 Jan 2018 #3