Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Since it appears that only celebrities can be POTUS now, who would you prefer? [View all]KatyMan
(4,339 posts)53. aw man you beat me to it! :)
My very first thought was Velma.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since it appears that only celebrities can be POTUS now, who would you prefer? [View all]
Dreamer Tatum
Jan 2018
OP
I am 41, not that young. Josie and the Pussie Cats were slightly before my time
tymorial
Jan 2018
#30
well, to be honest, even traditional politco candidates become "celebrities" by the time
hlthe2b
Jan 2018
#11
Might as follow this trend to its logical conclusion and elect a fictional character
Orrex
Jan 2018
#38
Luke Wilson--He proved that he can be President, in the future, when Americans are stupid, like now.
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2018
#47
Michael McKean, but only if he agrees to play POTUS as his "Better Call Saul" character, Chuck.
klook
Jan 2018
#50
I think after two actors in the job, we've proven celebrities are a bad idea.
lagomorph777
Jan 2018
#51
Maria Alyokhina, the leader of the Russian girl band, Pussy Riot
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Jan 2018
#78