General Discussion

snooper2

(30,151 posts)

6. somebody having a sad day

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Mon Jan 8, 2018, 01:58 PM

Jan 2018

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

77 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders Family Disputes Report of Escalating Burlington College Probe [View all] Omaha Steve Jan 2018 OP

A grand jury is an escalation, but it doesn't mean indictments are coming. PragmaticDem Jan 2018 #1

Exactly n/t emulatorloo Jan 2018 #3

So Weaver is calling Robin Lloyd a liar? emulatorloo Jan 2018 #2

Changed its original headline, Grand jury empaneled in Burlington College case, to a new one Omaha Steve Jan 2018 #4

Heres a link to updated article for those who missed it emulatorloo Jan 2018 #5

I think Jane Sanders may be in trouble. No matter how you parse it the Feds are looking into it. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #41

I'd Like To Know How She Got Away With Paying Her Daughter 1/2 A Mil Me. Jan 2018 #57

I would also like to hear about that. nt R B Garr Jan 2018 #58

At BC & also on the resort at St Lucia. Quite the gig, huh! Wwcd Jan 2018 #59

There Is Also Thia Me. Jan 2018 #60

Wow! Thanks for that update. I hadn't read about that part ., ME. Wwcd Jan 2018 #61

And While We're Talking Money Me. Jan 2018 #63

That is what gives me pause. I have a family member who gave his Mom a loan on her house when she Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #64

God, What Is Illegal About Giving A Mom A Loan Me. Jan 2018 #66

You aren't allowed to lend to family. He was a banker. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #72

She Does Need To Be As Accountable As Anyone Else Me. Jan 2018 #74

This message was self-deleted by its author ehrnst Jan 2018 #16

The first paragraph of the article is misleading in its phrasing ehrnst Jan 2018 #19

somebody having a sad day snooper2 Jan 2018 #6

Thank Omaha Steve GaryCnf Jan 2018 #7

Unfortunately Vermont Seven Days has a misleading first paragraph ehrnst Jan 2018 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author LenaBaby61 Jan 2018 #8

"Sanders Family Disputes Report of Escalating Burlington College Probe." LenaBaby61 Jan 2018 #9

I think he will run for POTUS in 2020 ehrnst Jan 2018 #15

IMHO Me. Jan 2018 #52

He should delay delay and delay and hope Democrats are back in office by 20. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #71

I Don't Know How He Can Delay Me. Jan 2018 #75

"Sanders family spokesman Jeff Weaver cast doubt on it. " NCTraveler Jan 2018 #10

This and other updates GaryCnf Jan 2018 #11

Yes, but weren't documents subpoenaed pursuant to a grand jury investigation? lapucelle Jan 2018 #12

Yes indeed GaryCnf Jan 2018 #13

"The current status of any grand jury investigation into Burlington College is unclear." ehrnst Jan 2018 #17

And, once again, that statement is technically correct GaryCnf Jan 2018 #21

So you're saying that the only reason anyone would even imagine that there was, ehrnst Jan 2018 #22

I appreciate this GaryCnf Jan 2018 #24

+1! KPN Jan 2018 #54

So there is evidence that there is a grand jury investigation of the Burlington College land deal lapucelle Jan 2018 #23

Please re-read the post to which you replied. GaryCnf Jan 2018 #25

I think I'll just re-read the subpoena issued pursuant to the grand jury investigation. lapucelle Jan 2018 #30

Lol GaryCnf Jan 2018 #32

Well... KTM Jan 2018 #27

Absolutely. KPN Jan 2018 #55

Because they deny it it's not true? Remember, trump repeatedly claimed there was no contact... George II Jan 2018 #31

Because "who" denies "what?" GaryCnf Jan 2018 #34

Isn't fraud a crime?? Bernie's whole campaign platform surrounded calling R B Garr Jan 2018 #35

When it happens, fraud is a crime GaryCnf Jan 2018 #36

Yes, FACTS are important. Fantasy allegations just to R B Garr Jan 2018 #37

I can only conclude GaryCnf Jan 2018 #38

No, the hypocrisy exposure has already happened. R B Garr Jan 2018 #39

Well I must apologize for reading GaryCnf Jan 2018 #40

The counter-argument that there was a grand jury convened for the case? ehrnst Jan 2018 #45

For the reasons I have set out (again) GaryCnf Jan 2018 #48

You are suggesting that grand juries are convened just to harass people? R B Garr Jan 2018 #50

If a witness testified before a Grand jury than a Grand Jury is empaneled. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #42

There is no dispute whether GaryCnf Jan 2018 #46

Again, you imply that the only reason anyone would acknowledge ehrnst Jan 2018 #44

Please do not misunderstand me GaryCnf Jan 2018 #47

Can They Interview Witnesses Without Being Empanaled? Me. Jan 2018 #53

Grand juries aren't convened on just fantasy or rumor ehrnst Jan 2018 #43

Grand juries are convened as a matter of course GaryCnf Jan 2018 #49

Exactly. Now we're being told that grand juries are convened just R B Garr Jan 2018 #51

Toensing is actually irrelevant. Jane lied to the bank to get a loan Wwcd Jan 2018 #67

So you've gone straight to GaryCnf Jan 2018 #68

No. Those are the questions being asked. I have no idea what she actually did. Wwcd Jan 2018 #69

"Sanders family spokesman Jeff Weaver" LexVegas Jan 2018 #14

Not sure why they keep him on, other than he's an insider ehrnst Jan 2018 #18

Personal friend. emulatorloo Jan 2018 #28

There is the issue of trust ehrnst Jan 2018 #29

Yes, an insider to the campaign. He probably knows everything. George II Jan 2018 #33

I guess he has to resign then. Jakes Progress Jan 2018 #26

" Isn't that the situation that "forced" Bernie to demand that Al Franken resign." Wwcd Jan 2018 #56

That's a very good point and analogy. Al didn't even get a grand jury. R B Garr Jan 2018 #62

He can't. They have a GOP governor. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #65

Didn't bother him to put Franken's seat in play. Jakes Progress Jan 2018 #70

It wouldn't be in play...the governor would appoint a Republican...do you ever thing what it would Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #73

Stop being silly. Jakes Progress Jan 2018 #76

This sucks for our us, but it is war. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2018 #77