Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Mueller-Trump Interview Is The Tolling Bell For the Trump Admin [View all]robertpaulsen
(8,697 posts)32. History question for anyone.
Did Archibald Cox interview Nixon prior to being fired as Special Prosecutor? Just wondering if Mueller has to interview Trump or if he can tighten the noose more surreptitiously without having to alert Trump that he is the target.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Mueller-Trump Interview Is The Tolling Bell For the Trump Admin [View all]
berni_mccoy
Jan 2018
OP
It is unlikely that he can refuse the interview. He can always plead the 5th Amendment
berni_mccoy
Jan 2018
#2
So Trump would do better to fight the interview and conduct a massive PR campaign
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#13
In ordinary political times, yes, absolutely. However he is an utter liar and the Republicans are so
OnDoutside
Jan 2018
#42
I think his lawyers will tell him to plead the 5th, but his arrogence will, like always...
Javaman
Jan 2018
#35
Pleading the 5th, like what Hillary Clinton did? Wait, Nevermind. It will be Trump doing it--again!
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2018
#112
That was my thought, also. Appeal to the buffoon's Stability, Genius, Smartest Asshole in the room
erronis
Jan 2018
#24
Not for nothing, but refusing to release your tax returns means you have something to hide
Cosmocat
Jan 2018
#55
He can say Mueller is on a witch hunt and any interview will be rigged and fake news.
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#75
Yes, what he would uncover, how he would proceed, the consequences. And personal safety issues.
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#86
I believe he has the goods on them. But Mueller is also concerned about the big picture.
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#20
I think he knows he cannot run a lawn mower over two branches of the American government.
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#79
In his mind I believe he feels he has a responsibility to the country, not just the law.
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#84
They have never gone after all of them before. Not how Washington or the elites work.
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#80
We have a totally corrupt GOP congress, Mueller will not put them all in prison.
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#87
That is why Mueller is having some sleepless nights. Damage either way he goes. nt
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#83
Every one of the people Mueller could bring down IS doing serious damage to the US.
lagomorph777
Jan 2018
#66
I think people would be shocked to learn how many corrupt leaders we have. nt
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#98
I think the length of the interview (testimony?) will play a large role in the process
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Jan 2018
#34
There is plenty of material that the question, the answer or both don't involve National Security
berni_mccoy
Jan 2018
#52
He will lie and he will contradict the things he's said on air and on twitter.
lindysalsagal
Jan 2018
#94
I seem to remember that a court ruled that a tweet by tRUMP was admissible in court ...
SWBTATTReg
Jan 2018
#36
You're probably right, I am thinking about something else I guess, where a judge ...
SWBTATTReg
Jan 2018
#45
Lying by tweet may not be a crime, but obstruction and witness tampering are
berni_mccoy
Jan 2018
#61
True or False: if Mueller is ready to interview shitgibbon, he's finished/nearly finished.
NightWatcher
Jan 2018
#46
This isn't the end, but it may be the beginning of the end, of the investigation.
LudwigPastorius
Jan 2018
#48
Thanx for your opening post. Outlines stuff for me! Beneficial discussion.
sprinkleeninow
Jan 2018
#51
There is a big difference between the 9/11 Commission and a Federal Investigation of Crimes
berni_mccoy
Jan 2018
#74
T is not capable of distinguishing truth from fiction. But it doesn't matter, since he loses
Amaryllis
Jan 2018
#106