Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Case You Missed This... 'No Wonder Eminent Domain Mortgage Seizures Scare Wall Street' [View all]DhhD
(4,695 posts)24. Some brand new homes never lived in were bulldozed in California several years ago.
Could these homes have been saved by the county in the way you describe? Seems like they were owned by a lending institute that could not get the price and loan that they wanted. Seems like people were living in tents in the community because they had been foreclosed on. This was only a few years ago.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In Case You Missed This... 'No Wonder Eminent Domain Mortgage Seizures Scare Wall Street' [View all]
WillyT
Jul 2012
OP
Under the Community Redevelopment Act, California cities have been buying distressed
JDPriestly
Jul 2012
#14
Are they lending now? Isn't that the problem? They have trillions hidden away in offshore hiding
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#9
Their $Trillions are dead money. They won't invest. It's a capital strike aimed at President Obama
byeya
Jul 2012
#36
Fine! They can stop investing in all their evil stuff here and we'll do it by ourselves!
freshwest
Jul 2012
#41
I'm not sure they are hoarding this money to make one candidate or the other look bad.
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#42
We know who the corporation is. What makes you think that this is the only Corp that can do this?
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#10
You are misunderstanding it I think. You need to read Matt Taibbi's article on it at Rolling Stone.
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#29
Excellent idea, at least people are beginning to think for themselves and beginning to recover from
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#30
I've got a song for those bankers thinking about leaving areas where their houses get taken
Zalatix
Jul 2012
#13
Lol, maybe we should have a huge concert in their honor to deliver the message, musically?
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#31
After Kelo vs. New London, Wall Street can't argue for a narrow definition of eminent domain
hatrack
Jul 2012
#18
They were only 'blighted' and vacant, in this case because the government eminent domain'ed them out
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2012
#38
Some brand new homes never lived in were bulldozed in California several years ago.
DhhD
Jul 2012
#24
Looks like a *form* of nationalization will occur from the ground up to save the ground from ruin.
freshwest
Jul 2012
#33