Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GaryCnf

(1,399 posts)
11. This and other updates
Mon Jan 8, 2018, 09:11 PM
Jan 2018

Have pretty much ended the dreams of those still determined to take Bernie down.

Robin Loyd's FULL story makes it clear that there is NO EVIDENCE of a grand jury investigation of Sanders, or, for that matter, the Burlington College case. She refused (failed might be a better word) to speak to FBI agents (which every citizen has a right to do) so the FBI asked the US attorney to use a sitting grand jury (which, unlike the FBI, does have the power to compel testimony) to force her to talk. Much to the chagrin of SOME, what Ms. Loyd says is entirely consistent with Jeff Weaver's statement that there is no grand jury empaneled to investigate Burlington College OR Jane Sanders.

This news is consistent with the Washington Post's retraction of its story claiming that such a grand jury had been empaneled after it was revealed that the Post had misinterpreted a subpoena seeking documents from state officials, another common law enforcement investigative tool where the materials sought cannot, or are not, turned over voluntarily and NOT proof that a grand jury has been investigating Sanders OR the Burlington College deal.

Finally, comes the news that Tony Pomerleau, a Burlington real estate mogul who was intimately involved in the attempt to expand Burlington College (and, in fact, contributed a $500,000 bridge loan) was interviewed by FBI agents in December '17. This is actually INCONSISTENT with the empaneling of an investigative grand jury, IF such a jury had been empaneled to consider charges, as VTDigger tried to claim, he would have been called to testify.

Particularly sad for those still fighting OUR ALLY Bernie Sanders were two bits of news that accompanied the last two stories. The subpoenaed documents produced NOTHING NEW and, this comment from Pomerleau,

"There was nothing that I had with [O'Meara Sanders] that meant anything to them," he said. Asked whether he shared anything that might incriminate O'Meara Sanders, who is married to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Pomerleau said, "No. If I did, I wouldn't tell you anyway."


https://www.sevendaysvt.com/OffMessage/archives/2018/01/08/feds-interview-pomerleau-in-burlington-college-investigation

I wonder if they know what "no" means?

So after the little flurry of revelry we've witnessed, what is the real "Breaking News?"

The FBI is still trying to find some evidence to support Brady Toensing's (Winger-N.C.) politically-motivated attack on the Sanders.

Are there REALLY Democrats who are celebrating THAT?

If anyone is unclear about how it works . . . J.D. NYU 1985, Clerk, United States Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit, 1985-1986, LDF (capital litigation, prisoner civil rights) 1986-1994, private practice, 1994-present (capital litigation, race-based civil rights litigation, restoration of rights) . . . provided because some have asked . . . I'll be glad to assist

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A grand jury is an escalation, but it doesn't mean indictments are coming. PragmaticDem Jan 2018 #1
Exactly n/t emulatorloo Jan 2018 #3
So Weaver is calling Robin Lloyd a liar? emulatorloo Jan 2018 #2
Changed its original headline, Grand jury empaneled in Burlington College case, to a new one Omaha Steve Jan 2018 #4
Heres a link to updated article for those who missed it emulatorloo Jan 2018 #5
I think Jane Sanders may be in trouble. No matter how you parse it the Feds are looking into it. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #41
I'd Like To Know How She Got Away With Paying Her Daughter 1/2 A Mil Me. Jan 2018 #57
I would also like to hear about that. nt R B Garr Jan 2018 #58
At BC & also on the resort at St Lucia. Quite the gig, huh! Wwcd Jan 2018 #59
There Is Also Thia Me. Jan 2018 #60
Wow! Thanks for that update. I hadn't read about that part ., ME. Wwcd Jan 2018 #61
And While We're Talking Money Me. Jan 2018 #63
That is what gives me pause. I have a family member who gave his Mom a loan on her house when she Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #64
God, What Is Illegal About Giving A Mom A Loan Me. Jan 2018 #66
You aren't allowed to lend to family. He was a banker. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #72
She Does Need To Be As Accountable As Anyone Else Me. Jan 2018 #74
This message was self-deleted by its author ehrnst Jan 2018 #16
The first paragraph of the article is misleading in its phrasing ehrnst Jan 2018 #19
somebody having a sad day snooper2 Jan 2018 #6
Thank Omaha Steve GaryCnf Jan 2018 #7
Unfortunately Vermont Seven Days has a misleading first paragraph ehrnst Jan 2018 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author LenaBaby61 Jan 2018 #8
"Sanders Family Disputes Report of Escalating Burlington College Probe." LenaBaby61 Jan 2018 #9
I think he will run for POTUS in 2020 ehrnst Jan 2018 #15
IMHO Me. Jan 2018 #52
He should delay delay and delay and hope Democrats are back in office by 20. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #71
I Don't Know How He Can Delay Me. Jan 2018 #75
"Sanders family spokesman Jeff Weaver cast doubt on it. " NCTraveler Jan 2018 #10
This and other updates GaryCnf Jan 2018 #11
Yes, but weren't documents subpoenaed pursuant to a grand jury investigation? lapucelle Jan 2018 #12
Yes indeed GaryCnf Jan 2018 #13
"The current status of any grand jury investigation into Burlington College is unclear." ehrnst Jan 2018 #17
And, once again, that statement is technically correct GaryCnf Jan 2018 #21
So you're saying that the only reason anyone would even imagine that there was, ehrnst Jan 2018 #22
I appreciate this GaryCnf Jan 2018 #24
+1! KPN Jan 2018 #54
So there is evidence that there is a grand jury investigation of the Burlington College land deal lapucelle Jan 2018 #23
Please re-read the post to which you replied. GaryCnf Jan 2018 #25
I think I'll just re-read the subpoena issued pursuant to the grand jury investigation. lapucelle Jan 2018 #30
Lol GaryCnf Jan 2018 #32
Well... KTM Jan 2018 #27
Absolutely. KPN Jan 2018 #55
Because they deny it it's not true? Remember, trump repeatedly claimed there was no contact... George II Jan 2018 #31
Because "who" denies "what?" GaryCnf Jan 2018 #34
Isn't fraud a crime?? Bernie's whole campaign platform surrounded calling R B Garr Jan 2018 #35
When it happens, fraud is a crime GaryCnf Jan 2018 #36
Yes, FACTS are important. Fantasy allegations just to R B Garr Jan 2018 #37
I can only conclude GaryCnf Jan 2018 #38
No, the hypocrisy exposure has already happened. R B Garr Jan 2018 #39
Well I must apologize for reading GaryCnf Jan 2018 #40
The counter-argument that there was a grand jury convened for the case? ehrnst Jan 2018 #45
For the reasons I have set out (again) GaryCnf Jan 2018 #48
You are suggesting that grand juries are convened just to harass people? R B Garr Jan 2018 #50
If a witness testified before a Grand jury than a Grand Jury is empaneled. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #42
There is no dispute whether GaryCnf Jan 2018 #46
Again, you imply that the only reason anyone would acknowledge ehrnst Jan 2018 #44
Please do not misunderstand me GaryCnf Jan 2018 #47
Can They Interview Witnesses Without Being Empanaled? Me. Jan 2018 #53
Grand juries aren't convened on just fantasy or rumor ehrnst Jan 2018 #43
Grand juries are convened as a matter of course GaryCnf Jan 2018 #49
Exactly. Now we're being told that grand juries are convened just R B Garr Jan 2018 #51
Toensing is actually irrelevant. Jane lied to the bank to get a loan Wwcd Jan 2018 #67
So you've gone straight to GaryCnf Jan 2018 #68
No. Those are the questions being asked. I have no idea what she actually did. Wwcd Jan 2018 #69
"Sanders family spokesman Jeff Weaver" LexVegas Jan 2018 #14
Not sure why they keep him on, other than he's an insider ehrnst Jan 2018 #18
Personal friend. emulatorloo Jan 2018 #28
There is the issue of trust ehrnst Jan 2018 #29
Yes, an insider to the campaign. He probably knows everything. George II Jan 2018 #33
I guess he has to resign then. Jakes Progress Jan 2018 #26
" Isn't that the situation that "forced" Bernie to demand that Al Franken resign." Wwcd Jan 2018 #56
That's a very good point and analogy. Al didn't even get a grand jury. R B Garr Jan 2018 #62
He can't. They have a GOP governor. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #65
Didn't bother him to put Franken's seat in play. Jakes Progress Jan 2018 #70
It wouldn't be in play...the governor would appoint a Republican...do you ever thing what it would Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #73
Stop being silly. Jakes Progress Jan 2018 #76
This sucks for our us, but it is war. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2018 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sanders Family Disputes R...»Reply #11