Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

veganlush

(2,049 posts)
28. we should just apply it honestly
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 05:13 PM
Jul 2012

nobody can convince me that that they said "well regulated militia" for no reason, first of all. Secondly, when it was ratified, "arms" meant something totally different than it does today. If they meant any weapon that we come up with, any "arms" at all, then suitcase nukes and flame throwers and nuclear warheads and dirty bombs belong not just in every home if you want one (as many as you want) but we also should be able to walk down the street or go into any place with any and all of these things anytime, or the "shall not be infringed" is meaningless.

But the weirdest part of all this is reason given: that we all need the ability to be armed against a "tyrannical government" yet it's the leaders of government, the ones that the NRA keep it their pockets, that are almost immune to the effects of these weapons being everywhere. remember when people complained about congressmen getting perks that we, their employers don't get? Like better healthcare choices, etc? Congressmen that live in the NRA's pocket should be required to hold regular, gabby giffords style open-air townhall meetings at parking lots, etc, having no more protection than the rest of us have going to the mall or the movies. Then you would see some real action on gun control and really, really fast.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Should we repeal the 2nd Amendment? [View all] UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 OP
Yes. Because it has been consistently & deliberately misinterpreted throughout it's history. baldguy Jul 2012 #1
Had to vote yes... Kalidurga Jul 2012 #2
Why should gun owners be required to have insurance on their guns? soccer1 Jul 2012 #14
I voted No . orpupilofnature57 Jul 2012 #3
How many repeal/rewrite the 2nd amendemnt threads have been posted here... -..__... Jul 2012 #4
Half as many as there willl be in a week. orpupilofnature57 Jul 2012 #25
Repeal, no. Modify, yes. Warpy Jul 2012 #5
The solution is to ban assault rifles and multiple round magazines. Tx4obama Jul 2012 #6
Exactly. UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #7
What is a "multiple round magazine" Marinedem Jul 2012 #9
Six is all you'd get if I had my way. UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #23
What is your definition of the function of an assault weapon and why do you TheKentuckian Jul 2012 #15
Poll from Friday OhioChick Jul 2012 #8
Sorry, just had to say I love you signature line n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #10
Thanks OhioChick Jul 2012 #12
I didn't see that. UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #11
You could see how the weekend crowd feels OhioChick Jul 2012 #13
May I make a suggestion? SoutherDem Jul 2012 #16
That's a good idea. UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #17
I will give it a shot. No pun intended. SoutherDem Jul 2012 #18
One shot is fine. UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #19
Here is the link SoutherDem Jul 2012 #21
New Poll posted. SoutherDem Jul 2012 #20
Excellent poll. UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #22
When I saw this poll my mind almost exploded because I was seeing... joshcryer Jul 2012 #24
I am not in favor of guns but no we should not touch the second amendment. What we should do... liberal N proud Jul 2012 #26
No but there should be some common sence laws to own a gun doc03 Jul 2012 #27
we should just apply it honestly veganlush Jul 2012 #28
Yes, it was for state MILITIAS not individuals. ErikJ Jul 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should we repeal the 2nd ...»Reply #28