General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's have a actual scientist as candidate. [View all]applegrove
(131,346 posts)That is my point. Doctors connect so well all day long with patients that you assume that warmth and care can make it through the tv camera. I'm sure some of them would be good politicians. I just have talked to two doctors about the doctor's strike and they both thought the management of the strike did not do well with public relations. Sometimes when you put on a new hat it doesn't pan out so you cannot assume that brilliant science translates immediatly to policy and political life. Obviously the Mark Kelly's and Neil D. Tyson of the world can connect better than any politician. So Democrats need to vet. As they would with any candidate. And not just assume that a scientist with a good heart and brilliant mind is going to automatically appeal to the public.