Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I dare say Oprah is not that different from Obama!! [View all]bettyellen
(47,209 posts)49. We have lots of people who could beat Trump for fucks sake. False narrative. She pitched too much
woo not to be an embarrment. Her speech wasnt about HER saving us- it was about us saving us. What a joke.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am a woman...and from what I can tell...part of why Hillary lost is because she is a woman.
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#45
I agree with most of what you said. There was a lot of sexism against Hillary, but I'm...
brush
Jan 2018
#59
I will vote for who ever is the Democratic nominee. I want one that can win...being able to fix
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#67
Any Dem who has the greatest chance of beating the Repubs, big time. Forget the poles, they don't
Alice11111
Jan 2018
#113
Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million. Being a woman is no longer a deal breaker.
LAS14
Jan 2018
#77
True. And Oprah would certainly cut into trump's white women vote. They were a huge...
brush
Jan 2018
#89
Should a bright kid, straight out of college, apply for CEO of a major corporation?
FiveGoodMen
Jan 2018
#52
"is your point that you can't win a presidential election without experience?"
FiveGoodMen
Jan 2018
#63
They both left Harvard, without graduating, so not to miss the opportunity before them.
Alice11111
Jan 2018
#114
Her genuine kindness would be an asset in getting the US back on track globally..n/t
monmouth4
Jan 2018
#28
The Secret, Dr Oz and Dr Phil.... her hatred of payin g taxes and business entanglements.
bettyellen
Jan 2018
#44
We have lots of people who could beat Trump for fucks sake. False narrative. She pitched too much
bettyellen
Jan 2018
#49
You totally missed the point of the speech. Elevating false heroes like its 2016 again is the
bettyellen
Jan 2018
#109
Not the kind GE voters will recognize...Trump is a celebrity president and has been awful.
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#40
I don't think a celebrity will help in 20...consider that some have recognized why electing a
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#69
Oh baloney...I have millenials in my house and they don't give a rats ass about Oprah.
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#81
and your millenial children probably don't give a rat's ass about experience either
ollie10
Jan 2018
#86
They are not interested right now...they are more focused on 18. I want to win.
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#102
Maybe you will come to the new Obama Library being built here to learn more about his
lunasun
Jan 2018
#5
America has to decide if it wants to be seen as a serious, responsible country.
Irish_Dem
Jan 2018
#13
She will win. If we nominate someone who doesn't win....then we get 4 more years of Trump
ollie10
Jan 2018
#27
if your argument is that the founding fathers were a bunch of dicks, then I am sure Trump would
ollie10
Jan 2018
#76
So Einstein.....the Constitution does not require experience to be president.....
ollie10
Jan 2018
#97
Yea, it doesn't require you to prove mental fitness either, thus we have Trump.
phleshdef
Jan 2018
#99
I hope not. Our party has lost its damn mind if we do some stupid shit like that.
phleshdef
Jan 2018
#85
You can't get hired as a teacher unless you are certified...she has not experience and what makes
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#33
What did the founding fathers say about the number of years experience required to be president?
ollie10
Jan 2018
#36
What does that have to do with anything...but they did set an age requirement which in those days
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#78
I admire her tremendously. I don't think she should be president. She is a great person from what I
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#87
He helped form the government so yeah he had 'experience'.But seriously comparing the
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#98
No they don't. There are some programs to hire math and science but you have to obtain a teaching
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#74
The teacher has to pass a praxis...and is awarded temporary certification...based on
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#105
She is not a constitutional lawyer. She has not been involved in politics. If she is interested she
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#31
It is a discussion...and you have certainly discussed it...now you want 'to leave it to
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#71
Most presidents didn't have a "deep and educated knowledge of the constitution," I'm pretty sure. n
LAS14
Jan 2018
#90
I know no more than you do, but I'd bet that she'd surprise you if given a quiz. nt
LAS14
Jan 2018
#126
You post is so important...the most important one on this thread. There will be no Democratic
Demsrule86
Jan 2018
#96
This is why Democrats lose,because here we are talking about the Presidential primary
INdemo
Jan 2018
#116
This is utterly ridiculous. What is it with the cult of celebrity in America ?
OnDoutside
Jan 2018
#118
Sure, other than not being a constitutional scholar, state senator, U.S. Senator.....
BlueTsunami2018
Jan 2018
#124