Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But the FBI felt compelled to say that Hillary was under investigation right before the election. nt Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #1
They probably didn't have an asset to protect in the Clinton camp... Wounded Bear Jan 2018 #5
I understand why they did not tip their hand on Trump, but why make a public statement Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #6
Sorry if I sounded like I was defending how they handled the Clinton situation... Wounded Bear Jan 2018 #8
Oh I know you weren't. I am just asking rhetorical questions. Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #12
Giuliani and Clinton-hating FBI goons in NYC were pressuring & threatening Comey. nt tblue37 Jan 2018 #15
I know, but to me, the story seemed to have some missing pieces. Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #16
The NYC cadre had possession of Weiner's laptop, as I understand it. Their threat tblue37 Jan 2018 #26
Why was he so afraid of the GOP congress if that was a major pressure point for him? Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #30
He truly believed Clinton would win. Maybe, since he is a Republican, no doubt fairly conservative, tblue37 Jan 2018 #32
Interesting. Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #33
He had told congress he would keep them apprised of anything that came up. shraby Jan 2018 #39
Just surprising that a Washington insider would be so threatened by congress. Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #41
Yeah, it's all on Comey. He got suckered when he should've fired their asses. brush Jan 2018 #31
Not the only rotten branch of the FBI. Mopar151 Jan 2018 #40
Because they are repug, partisan hacks in the tank for the repug to win, even though... brush Jan 2018 #17
I know, but why did Comey fold like a lawn chair? Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #18
My question too, and from my understanding making statements that can effect an election... brush Jan 2018 #19
Yes Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #23
"If subordinates start threatening their boss, they need to be fired." True, but it is not that easy tblue37 Jan 2018 #48
Yes but certainly they can be moved, demoted or totally ignored. Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #53
Yes, that is what Wray did recently to a top FBI lawyer, Jim Baker. He moved him to tblue37 Jan 2018 #55
Right down here with the March Hare, Dormouse and the Mad Hatter, the rogue NY FBI chapter MadLinguist Jan 2018 #24
Good analogies, but you've got to give us the reason why on the raven. brush Jan 2018 #29
well, I was riffing on Lewis Carroll given Pierce's refernce to a rabbit hole, BUT! MadLinguist Jan 2018 #35
I think you may have filled in the missing "why" Comey didn't rein in the NY field office... brush Jan 2018 #36
deleting, Ii meant to reply to Brush, post 36 MadLinguist Jan 2018 #37
I'm trying to understand it for the same reasons. Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #43
Again, though, he really assumed Clinton would win anyway, and probably he thought tblue37 Jan 2018 #49
I don't think he was that naive to believe that letter wouldn't be leaked and swing the election brush Jan 2018 #51
I agree with you that Comey let the FBI and the country down with his October surprise letter MadLinguist Jan 2018 #54
Yes but why protect your reputation by doing something more damaging? Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #44
Yes, closer. I think MadLinquist's posts filled in some gaps, as did Feinstein's release yesterday. brush Jan 2018 #46
Yes, exactly. nt Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #47
+1, very unethical and now every office holder who can bring charges to a candidate will take Comeys uponit7771 Jan 2018 #62
Yes, we now know the FBI can be bribed/threatened into taking action against a candidate's opponents Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #66
Damn, jus messed up !!! uponit7771 Jan 2018 #68
Unfortunately, we may never fully know why. paleotn Jan 2018 #20
Right, the "New York meanies made me do it" falls a bit short of the whole picture. nt Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #25
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2018 #10
They were probably videotaping Trump from a microwave. Poiuyt Jan 2018 #2
On that model isn't the video camera behind the "Popcorn" button? WheelWalker Jan 2018 #3
Randy Rainbow w/ "Microwaves" smirkymonkey Jan 2018 #14
His ice cream was bugged LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2018 #52
better a mole than a wart DBoon Jan 2018 #4
I see an artery in Trump's forehead throbbing so hard it's looking to burst BoneyardDem Jan 2018 #7
Frankly, I'd hate for him to have an embolism before we can take him down... Wounded Bear Jan 2018 #9
No, whats bad is the FBI may have told Fusion they had a source in the trump campaign. 4139 Jan 2018 #11
Correction, the "walk-in whistleblower" was the Australian diplomat. L. Coyote Jan 2018 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author triron Jan 2018 #34
But Papadopoulos was NOT a voluntary witness- he lied to the FBI so this cant be about him being bettyellen Jan 2018 #57
Papa is the person who drunkenly spilled the goods to the Australian diplomat in London. L. Coyote Jan 2018 #61
I think that speculation is incorrect- they said they had a volunteer who had been w Trump campaign bettyellen Jan 2018 #63
Check out this thread: L. Coyote Jan 2018 #64
Thanks! Well, thats interesting. This is going to be some story when all is told! bettyellen Jan 2018 #65
The FBI has "moles" everywhere. That is their job McCamy Taylor Jan 2018 #21
I wonder if they are embedded in every presidential campaign? Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #27
Fair Assumption Kristofer Bry Jan 2018 #22
I'm guessing Priebus elfin Jan 2018 #28
Is this Pierce idiot even a reporter? They didn't say "in the campaign" snooper2 Jan 2018 #38
Didn't specify? Gee, are you sure that's what it said? kcr Jan 2018 #67
would be a surprise if there were only one whistleblower. nt wiggs Jan 2018 #42
Yup - that's the big story from the Fusion GPS transcript. lagomorph777 Jan 2018 #45
The mole was Papadopoulos, and the walk-in informant was the Australian guy he blabbed to. nt tblue37 Jan 2018 #50
But Papadopoulos wasnt a volunteer informant -he was flipped. bettyellen Jan 2018 #56
I think the testimony is fuzzy around the edges. If Papadopoulos was flipped early and then tblue37 Jan 2018 #58
Isnt there a timeline for Papadopoulos? Im hoping there are others- like the lawyer bettyellen Jan 2018 #59
If Corallo did not go to the FBI when he quit over the obstruction of justice taint, tblue37 Jan 2018 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pierce: It's Probably B...»Reply #2