General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pro Tip for Men: Only Enthusiastic Consent is Consent. Here Is a Guide: [View all]MineralMan
(151,345 posts)If both people who are having sex are enthusiastic about having sex, where is the conflict? I don't remember any relationship I've been in where the other person has been pissed off after having sex. Because both of us were enthusiastic participants every time, no conflict existed. Nobody did anything the other person didn't want to do. Both people were participating in intimacy that was wanted.
When one of us was interested, but the other wasn't, no sex took place. When both people actively want to have sex and to participate in particular activities, there shouldn't be any problem. If one person isn't in the mood for some particular thing, that person might be very happy with some other activity. I'm not going to go into detail about that, because anyone can think of situations.
Sex between two people is always mutually consensual, or should be. And that means not just any sex, but the actual things that the two people are doing together. Sex is a negotiation, in many ways. If one person wants to do one thing, but the other person doesn't want to do that, then something else is probably a better idea and won't cause any conflict.
I do not understand how sex that leads to conflict is pleasurable for anyone. Sex is fun. Sex is pleasurable. If it's neither, then someone is not going to be happy. I don't remember any time in my life when making someone else happy wasn't part of the reason for having sex. I don't get why anyone would want to continue if the other person is unhappy with what's going on.