Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Anon-C

(3,440 posts)
4. The change goes to far and increases the chance...
Mon Jan 15, 2018, 03:19 PM
Jan 2018

...that an alert will not be sent in a timely manner or at all in an actual attack.

The problem was not in having a single initiator able to send the alert, the problem was in having this desktop setup as a primary terminal for sending test alerts or alerts at all really.

FEMA should require IPAWS alerting agencies to have a peripheral physical red button with a separate Test button that can only send the test automated alert. Screens are a suboptimal interface for alerting for this very reason, they should be used for message configuration, not for message launch.

By adding another person to the alert chain, without an obvious override readily available to a single operator, Hawaii has increased the time it takes to send an alert and created a point of failure should anything incapacitate one of the two operators.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How bizarre that they did not install a fail safe option ab initio dhol82 Jan 2018 #1
The option to test a system or do training exercises should never have included procon Jan 2018 #2
So instead of being fired they get a new job. former9thward Jan 2018 #3
I kinda feel for the guy Evergreen Emerald Jan 2018 #5
I think you're making some unwarrented assumptions. CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2018 #6
You are making the assumption the person "is lucky to have escaped termination" former9thward Jan 2018 #14
We are not entitled to know if a state employee receives a reprimand Generic Brad Jan 2018 #16
Some of the other posts explain what is being done to correct the problem. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2018 #17
The Today show reported that the person was suspended pending investigation. Tipperary Jan 2018 #19
Looking at the system he operated with there's no way I'd fire this person ... no way. A one uponit7771 Jan 2018 #10
It was the operator's fault. former9thward Jan 2018 #15
It's not the operators fault there's a one confirm nuclear system, the operator didn't make the ... uponit7771 Jan 2018 #20
You are stating the state of Hawaii which created the system former9thward Jan 2018 #21
No, I'm stating their nuclear alert system does not meet the standard of a 5 the world high school.. uponit7771 Jan 2018 #22
The change goes to far and increases the chance... Anon-C Jan 2018 #4
Too many assumptions to make the claim. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2018 #8
just because it takes 2 people doesn't mean only 2 physical humans are able to do it ... mr_lebowski Jan 2018 #9
True enough, and perhaps I was being to speculative. Nt Anon-C Jan 2018 #11
Who assigned that employee to that position? lpbk2713 Jan 2018 #7
NSA could have fixed this before it became a problem jmowreader Jan 2018 #12
Reassigned? He should be fired. smirkymonkey Jan 2018 #13
Maybe even charged with inciting a riot nm MichMan Jan 2018 #26
I wonder what else is on the drop down menu ThoughtCriminal Jan 2018 #18
Its the fault of whoever designed the system spinbaby Jan 2018 #24
Well just don't replace him/her with Alexa. miyazaki Jan 2018 #23
Alexa, send a launch order... ThoughtCriminal Jan 2018 #25
rofl. say guys, what'ya want for launch? nt miyazaki Jan 2018 #27
What if people had been hurt Sampan Jan 2018 #28
Apparently, the drop down menu had 2 options ThoughtCriminal Jan 2018 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hawaii alert: Employee wh...»Reply #4