Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Gentleperson's Guide To Forum Spies [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)147. I'm certainly willing to entertain offers of large sums of money to post on the internet.
I'm not saying I would accept any, but I wouldnt mind seeing the offers and what is required.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
191 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It shouldn't be ignored. But we should discuss how to avoid false positives, since those,
patrice
Jul 2012
#94
Do you people really think you're that important? Who really cares what is posted? lol
xtraxritical
Jul 2012
#83
I bookmarked it first thing. I'm so sick of these tactics on DU that I could scream.
loudsue
Jul 2012
#37
IS there a technique that involves putting up posts that take three hours to read?
CBGLuthier
Jul 2012
#3
I wouldn't have offered constructive criticism except for your post about too heavy to lift..
Fumesucker
Jul 2012
#63
If you want to see this in action, just go check out some of the recent gun threads.
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#9
The term "false positive" and witch hunt comes to mind. At least to mine. NT
Democracyinkind
Jul 2012
#21
Given news articles on "sock puppet" governmental agents on the internet over the past year or so,
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#25
Democracyinkind is not damning. S/he's raising legitimate PROCESS questions. You are the one
patrice
Jul 2012
#88
The point is: Apply this list to a hypothetical case of suspected disruption, how do you do that?
patrice
Jul 2012
#97
I do not disagree. I do not agree either. Let's just say I'll be skeptical of all positions.
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#104
I've seen this on other sites. The caveat was that it had to be posted in it's entirety
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#27
it's all nicked from various sources over the years, such as Ron Paul forums
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2012
#60
Parts 2 and 3 by H. Michael Sweeney - gives permission to reprint in whole with author's
leveymg
Jul 2012
#81
Yes, really. All the things you just noted had a point to them. You and I wouldnt have done them
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#178
Thank you for posting this - good, useful information that all DUers should be familiar with
leveymg
Jul 2012
#31
Here's an excellent bedside book: Christopher Simpson's, "The Science of Coercion"
leveymg
Jul 2012
#75
Not safe enough! I've pasted a printout over the right side of my screen so it's always fresh
petronius
Jul 2012
#86
Quite so. I think the worst thing you can do to the 'other side' is get them all suspicious of each
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#138
I'm certainly willing to entertain offers of large sums of money to post on the internet.
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#147
Too long; where's the part where you make people distrust everything on the forum?
bluedigger
Jul 2012
#35
But, I have no doubt the NRA, the nuclear power industry, and other astroturfers do.
leveymg
Jul 2012
#52
Yep. Thanks. That's the book on corporate hacks and the Anti-Social Justice Movement.
Zorra
Jul 2012
#100
Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING' - LOL my response is completely outside their box.
Zalatix
Jul 2012
#129
... and thus people attribute negative changes to communities as a naturally entropic phenomenon
NuttyFluffers
Jul 2012
#145
Let's assume BBI was an 'agent'. What do you think they accomplished on behalf of whomever
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#179