Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(25,577 posts)

6. too vague, assumes a conclusion, and would keep people from saying "What's that all about anyway?"

Thu Jan 18, 2018, 01:44 AM

Jan 2018

I'm talking about branding to get the word out. Not editorializing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Democrats need to start calling this whole thing RUSSIA-GATE when on TV. [View all] TeamPooka Jan 2018 OP

i think gate needs to be retired Takket Jan 2018 #1

I agree with retiring the term "gate" appended to every scandal worstexever Jan 2018 #10

I'm quite happy equating tRump with Russia ProudLib72 Jan 2018 #2

TREASON-GATE Skittles Jan 2018 #3

+1,000,000... n/t PoiBoy Jan 2018 #5

I agree... ghostsinthemachine Jan 2018 #4

Needs to have Trump in name. Justice Jan 2018 #7

Watergate didn't need Nixon's name in it and that worked out just fine TeamPooka Jan 2018 #9

Yes! "Russia-gate" is solid, effective. So is "The Russia Scandal" DemocracyMouse Jan 2018 #8