Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Problem With Pursing Legal Means To Address Unlawfulness Is That The GOP Won't Jail Anyone. [View all]FreepFryer
(7,086 posts)1. So you're advocating Democrats use UNLAWFUL means to address GOP unlawfulness? How quaint.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Problem With Pursing Legal Means To Address Unlawfulness Is That The GOP Won't Jail Anyone. [View all]
TheMastersNemesis
Jan 2018
OP
So you're advocating Democrats use UNLAWFUL means to address GOP unlawfulness? How quaint.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#1
"The problem with pursuing legal means is that GOP won't jail anyone" - "legal means won't work."
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#3
I just answered your question. Whatever "the problem with legal means," those are the only means.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#6
Reading always requires interpretation. I will call out posts that encourage illegal activity,
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#9
You're welcome to your interpretation. I obviously completely disagree that 'nothing could be done'.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#11
But that is another strawman. It does not say 'nothing could be done' by anyone else.
Jarqui
Jan 2018
#14
LOL. YOUR Strawman. WHO is facing a problem pursuing legal means in the OP? Democrats. (n/t)
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#15
No, as written it implies 'what OTHER THAN LEGAL MEANS can we do about this.'
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#16
I would be glad if no-one else made that inference, but it appears I'm not the only one. (n/t)
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#29
"The problem with pursuing legal means to obtain a car is that I don't have enough money"
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#18
Pressing on, on every front, to legally upend the regime. In as many ways as there are Americans.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#22
In Churchill's words, "KBO". You figure out how that makes sense in your own context.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#24
Churchill's aren't just "pretty words" and it's not my job to specify EXACTLY what YOU should do.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#28
Nope. My objection to the OP doesn't require me to advise ANYONE on alternative courses. (n/t)
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#31
Agency means WE EACH DECIDE - yet you demand I tell YOU exactly what to do. Your argument is invalid
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#36
Any act can be a political act. Every morning, CHOOSE YOURS - AND DON'T GIVE UP.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#39
Not a deflection at all - I'm just not going to tell you EXACTLY what to do, as you demand.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#41
You have dismissed what I have said thus far, so you don't deserve any help from me.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#45
I always like a thread where the OP throws out a wild statement and doesn't stay around to discuss.
brooklynite
Jan 2018
#34