Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Problem With Pursing Legal Means To Address Unlawfulness Is That The GOP Won't Jail Anyone. [View all]FreepFryer
(7,086 posts)28. Churchill's aren't just "pretty words" and it's not my job to specify EXACTLY what YOU should do.
Think for yourself.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Problem With Pursing Legal Means To Address Unlawfulness Is That The GOP Won't Jail Anyone. [View all]
TheMastersNemesis
Jan 2018
OP
So you're advocating Democrats use UNLAWFUL means to address GOP unlawfulness? How quaint.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#1
"The problem with pursuing legal means is that GOP won't jail anyone" - "legal means won't work."
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#3
I just answered your question. Whatever "the problem with legal means," those are the only means.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#6
Reading always requires interpretation. I will call out posts that encourage illegal activity,
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#9
You're welcome to your interpretation. I obviously completely disagree that 'nothing could be done'.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#11
But that is another strawman. It does not say 'nothing could be done' by anyone else.
Jarqui
Jan 2018
#14
LOL. YOUR Strawman. WHO is facing a problem pursuing legal means in the OP? Democrats. (n/t)
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#15
No, as written it implies 'what OTHER THAN LEGAL MEANS can we do about this.'
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#16
I would be glad if no-one else made that inference, but it appears I'm not the only one. (n/t)
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#29
"The problem with pursuing legal means to obtain a car is that I don't have enough money"
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#18
Pressing on, on every front, to legally upend the regime. In as many ways as there are Americans.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#22
In Churchill's words, "KBO". You figure out how that makes sense in your own context.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#24
Churchill's aren't just "pretty words" and it's not my job to specify EXACTLY what YOU should do.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#28
Nope. My objection to the OP doesn't require me to advise ANYONE on alternative courses. (n/t)
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#31
Agency means WE EACH DECIDE - yet you demand I tell YOU exactly what to do. Your argument is invalid
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#36
Any act can be a political act. Every morning, CHOOSE YOURS - AND DON'T GIVE UP.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#39
Not a deflection at all - I'm just not going to tell you EXACTLY what to do, as you demand.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#41
You have dismissed what I have said thus far, so you don't deserve any help from me.
FreepFryer
Jan 2018
#45
I always like a thread where the OP throws out a wild statement and doesn't stay around to discuss.
brooklynite
Jan 2018
#34