Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some thoughts on the "If someone else had a gun" argument re: Aurora [View all]Remmah2
(3,291 posts)64. Too bad ballistic armor wasn't as thick as some people.
Then again it protects some people in their world.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
246 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Some thoughts on the "If someone else had a gun" argument re: Aurora [View all]
WilliamPitt
Jul 2012
OP
conservatives consistently have the highest number of idiots and they support morons.
samsingh
Jul 2012
#216
this is just some stuff they found in the car. Nothing there says this is everything he wore
librechik
Jul 2012
#44
Here is how he was dressed according to the Pragmatic Progressive's FB page
Esse Quam Videri
Jul 2012
#115
yep--and there wasn't time and too much confusion for a bunch of guys to get together
librechik
Jul 2012
#117
only because they feel good about their guns and how the others feel uncomfortable means nothing.
samsingh
Jul 2012
#68
You can still be shot to death wearing body armor. It doesn't make you invincible.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#91
He was wearing a Blackhawk ballistic vest. NOT BULLETPROOF. NOT EVEN FULL COVERAGE.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#134
The 'chief' didn't post here - you did. If I can find the truth in seconds why should you be able
Edweird
Jul 2012
#167
LULZ. If you say so. My cite has the company that sold him his gear. Yours has nothing.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#178
If you are going to sarcastically call someone a "genius", it would help to spell it correctly.
zappaman
Jul 2012
#222
A list of his purchases was released to the media. The vest listed is not in any way armor.
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#232
You do realize that you get nowhere arguing with the Range Rambos...
TreasonousBastard
Jul 2012
#241
Because the media cited item that he was purported wearing wasn't armor
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#231
yes--anyone would have done the same-except for everybody who was actually there
librechik
Jul 2012
#120
You also said that you were an ex-cop before. Was that when you had the shoot outs?
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#190
everybody should have been trained to shoot in the dark in a theater at a crazy man from every angle
samsingh
Jul 2012
#36
Some extraordinarily brave people were there who threw their bodies over others to protect them
aikoaiko
Jul 2012
#11
or Kevlar or whatever it was. There are examples of police dying from pistol shots even though...
aikoaiko
Jul 2012
#42
this sounds like a fact to me and one that does not support the proliferation of guns to reduce
samsingh
Jul 2012
#37
Fort Hood, and not even close to being the truth. The return fire from ther police was on target.
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#220
yup, so much for that - oh did you read the fact above about what happened at a military
samsingh
Jul 2012
#38
The only problem is that it didn't happen that way. The responing police only shot the suspect.
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#227
interestingly, when Dick Cheney spoke at a convention, he didn't want guns in the audience
samsingh
Jul 2012
#51
Good thing everyone in the theater was disarmed (by official policy)
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#46
The question is really moot, William. The theater has a policy prohibiting possession of firearms.
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#67
I'm pretty sure William was thinking of a scenario in which someone who is not well-trained decides
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#84
Obviously there were many factors that would have made a shot opportunity unlikely
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#97
Yes, that would be a *very* difficult shot. I've shot reduced light courses before, and played this
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#213
How did the LA robbers die? They were shot to death. They were covered head to toe and
Edweird
Jul 2012
#82
I never called the victims cowards - you did. That is typical gun grabber dishonesty.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#140
No we are talking about how you claimed his nylon load carrying vest was so impenetrable that
Edweird
Jul 2012
#149
Ok, so what armor was he wearing? Brand? Model? Threat level? Where did he buy it?
Edweird
Jul 2012
#188
That would be great - show one that tells what brand make model and threat level he was wearing
Edweird
Jul 2012
#193
A much better chance, though of hitting the wrong person-- in the dark, in the smoke, in the crowd.
LanternWaste
Jul 2012
#207
Enough already. Being shot with a .40 cal at relatively close range (within 25 yards) is not going
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#228
'Guys who shot up downtown LA back in the 90s'? - I think I missed that episode. Do you
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#101
Ah, NoHo. Not exactly 'downtown LA' but not exactly the Valley either. Thank you for the
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#116
gun supporting talking head said "if they didn't have a gun, it would be a rock" !!!
Liberal_in_LA
Jul 2012
#180
Sometimes I think the delusions of hero/grandeur are as dangerous and irresponsible as...
LanternWaste
Jul 2012
#211