Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
42. That's a good point
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 03:04 PM
Jul 2012

I need to check with my agent to see exactly what my umbrella policy covers with regards to firearms. I know it covers accidents, but you bring up a good point.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R! yellerpup Jul 2012 #1
As a shooting enthusiast... Lizzie Poppet Jul 2012 #2
Same here SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #3
Question? Remmah2 Jul 2012 #92
Touche' SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #102
:) Remmah2 Jul 2012 #121
Cool pic. permatex Jul 2012 #125
Those would be............. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #131
Ask Georgi Markov TheMightyFavog Jul 2012 #151
As a side issue, while it is laudable HockeyMom Jul 2012 #4
They should be held liable SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #6
In one word, YES HockeyMom Jul 2012 #10
Malpractice is normally not intentional SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #19
Only one is designed to kill. morningfog Jul 2012 #69
I think these women would disagree with you permatex Jul 2012 #77
Guns are designed for things other than killing SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #80
You are against the tobacco liability suits? morningfog Jul 2012 #84
Nope SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #100
Maybe, just maybe, the gun lobby and morningfog Jul 2012 #119
Perhaps they are SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #123
There are plenty of gun addicts. morningfog Jul 2012 #128
Do you have a cite for your claim that guns are an addiction? SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #146
See mirror. morningfog Jul 2012 #153
Designed to kill who? nt rrneck Jul 2012 #136
Strange how "illegal use" and "intended function" are one and the same, huh? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #55
Exactly, you made the point I was trying to make much better than I did. morningfog Jul 2012 #70
Hardly SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #104
A gun is a weapon. What is the function of a weapon? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #110
You haven't given any yet. morningfog Jul 2012 #124
How about this permatex Jul 2012 #133
Sorry I didn't jump as quick as you would like SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #144
And for the record SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #145
Gun manufacturers market these guns as "assault" and "tactical" weapons to appeal to baser instincts Hoyt Jul 2012 #114
Admit Hoyt permatex Jul 2012 #120
Why should they be held liable? permatex Jul 2012 #26
I've been talking about this Politicalboi Jul 2012 #5
I have no issue with insurance SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #7
Mandatory gun isurance. I like it. No insurance, no gun. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #8
Gun owner liability insurance would probably not cover an intentional shooting..... soccer1 Jul 2012 #9
You're probably right n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #11
I own a car and have never had an accident HockeyMom Jul 2012 #12
Mine will cover accidental and intentional shootings if the intentional permatex Jul 2012 #31
That's a good point SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #42
Makes sense. Self defense. soccer1 Jul 2012 #59
Yes. permatex Jul 2012 #65
if states require it, insurance will cover illegal shootings too.... mike_c Jul 2012 #48
Are you certain about covering illegal shootings if states require it? soccer1 Jul 2012 #86
if an automobile owner hits someone else while operating illegally... mike_c Jul 2012 #88
This argument convinces me. Democracyinkind Jul 2012 #154
There are so few shootings that it would be dirt cheap - couple of bucks at best. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #13
Mine is like a couple of hundred a year permatex Jul 2012 #36
on the other hand, the liability would be huge.... mike_c Jul 2012 #122
It would be an interesting academic exercise hack89 Jul 2012 #126
The number one clause in the policy... NCTraveler Jul 2012 #14
Exactly soccer1 Jul 2012 #16
Criminals wouldn't be buying insurance anyway hack89 Jul 2012 #18
You're right! But, it's not a stupid idea...... soccer1 Jul 2012 #20
Agreed SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #24
I don't know, but I imagine..... soccer1 Jul 2012 #34
Agree on all points SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #47
Of course not...... soccer1 Jul 2012 #62
Very good post. permatex Jul 2012 #58
Most gun owners I know carry insurance hack89 Jul 2012 #25
Yes, they are. Meanwhile we will soon have a "shooting mayhem" channel on basic. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #30
It is called the Nancy Grace show I think. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #35
Wouldn't most health insurance policies cover an accident? nt. NCTraveler Jul 2012 #32
Not liability.... soccer1 Jul 2012 #40
Not sure why I didn't think about that important aspect. NCTraveler Jul 2012 #60
'Duh" moments are a frequent occurrence for me.... soccer1 Jul 2012 #74
I can relate to that permatex Jul 2012 #81
63, here. soccer1 Jul 2012 #97
What were we talking about? permatex Jul 2012 #101
There will be a time when victims of guns will be denied. Laugh it off, but it's coming. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #41
Then the would be criminal would not be able to buy one at the store. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #27
You can purchase a gun legally and then use it for illegal means. nt. NCTraveler Jul 2012 #29
Yes you can. I like the process though. You think healthcare insurance is hard to get? Safetykitten Jul 2012 #37
"You think healthcare insurance is hard to get?" NCTraveler Jul 2012 #57
Registration v. purchase SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #38
Stopped for traffic violation? Oh, that insurance card for your car, nah...forget that. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #45
Yes, which is exactly what I said SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #52
No. To operate a gun, you would be required to have insurance. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #61
We don't register guns for one thing. hack89 Jul 2012 #44
You need insurance to OPERATE it. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #49
Only on public roads hack89 Jul 2012 #54
First, not all states require insurance SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #64
Please. Just stop. Most civilized states require a registration to operate a car. You have to prove Safetykitten Jul 2012 #73
Only on public roads - not on private property. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #79
Drive around on your property all you want. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #85
Let me own all the guns on my property that I want. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #93
Agreed nt permatex Jul 2012 #43
And what insurance company is going to WRITE that policy in the first place? Bake Jul 2012 #137
people got mad a few months ileus Jul 2012 #15
And car manufacturers too, right? hack89 Jul 2012 #17
I have insurance as a rider on my homeowners policy. permatex Jul 2012 #21
Also, accidental shootings might be covered under a homeowners or rental insurance policy soccer1 Jul 2012 #22
Internet Sales HockeyMom Jul 2012 #23
I saw the range owner on TV last night SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #28
Firearms bought over the internet already cannot be sent to your home permatex Jul 2012 #51
Ammo too HockeyMom Jul 2012 #66
We're just going to have to agree to disagree on this. permatex Jul 2012 #75
Are you saying you want background checks to buy ammo? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #105
Yes HockeyMom Jul 2012 #139
Nope SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #143
It would make millions for the NRA hack89 Jul 2012 #33
I think this is an excellent idea-- require ALL gun owners to carry liability insurance... mike_c Jul 2012 #39
It would make the NRA so much money - think how much more political power they will have. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #50
I seriously doubt that.... mike_c Jul 2012 #71
The NRA, just like AARP, endorses insurance already hack89 Jul 2012 #78
even if true, I think that's a bit of a red herring.... mike_c Jul 2012 #83
Insurance will not stop violence just like auto insurance does not stop accidents. hack89 Jul 2012 #91
look, we all know that part of the problem is that gun violence is cheap and easy in America.... mike_c Jul 2012 #129
I do not need insurance to keep and drive a car on private property hack89 Jul 2012 #130
false analogy.... mike_c Jul 2012 #132
I have insurance hack89 Jul 2012 #134
I'm talking about gun violence, not "accidents...." mike_c Jul 2012 #138
Lumping in lawful gun owners with gang bangers and other illegal gun users hack89 Jul 2012 #149
I checked HockeyMom Jul 2012 #106
What stops them from endorsing liability insurance? It is a can't miss business opportunity. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #111
Absolutely! soccer1 Jul 2012 #56
AND the gun manufacturers HockeyMom Jul 2012 #68
Why in the world would you hold a manufacturer permatex Jul 2012 #89
Most of us already carry liability insurance, because we own homes slackmaster Jul 2012 #103
does your policy cover negligent, accidental, or improper gun operation? mike_c Jul 2012 #117
My policy doesn't have any exclusions that mention firearms. It's the same as if I screw up with... slackmaster Jul 2012 #142
if you operate your automobile illegally, and cause an injury or property loss... mike_c Jul 2012 #152
If insurance companies could justify charging higher premiums for people who own guns, slackmaster Jul 2012 #155
I'd prefer jail terms..... bowens43 Jul 2012 #46
For the manufacturers? SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #108
Exactly. But any attempt to make gun owners "responsible" will be met with the usual whining villager Jul 2012 #53
Well, so far, most gun owners here agree permatex Jul 2012 #95
Really? "Most gun owners here agree?" villager Jul 2012 #96
Yes permatex Jul 2012 #99
No. Though you are free to post in the gungeon that guns should, at a minimum be regulated like cars villager Jul 2012 #112
I can't help that your too blind to see the truth permatex Jul 2012 #135
"If guns were as regulated as cars..." villager Jul 2012 #141
No NRA insurance HockeyMom Jul 2012 #63
No. People who buy guns have to have insurance. No registration. Just insurance. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #67
Yes, registration HockeyMom Jul 2012 #107
Only gun manufacturers? SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #72
The beauty of this is that insurance companies will destroy the gun market. Genius. Pure genius. Safetykitten Jul 2012 #76
Exactly my hidden agenda HockeyMom Jul 2012 #127
Lethal weapons HockeyMom Jul 2012 #109
How about all the other legal products that can be used illegally to kill people? SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #115
Do doctors have to carry liability insurance? HockeyMom Jul 2012 #140
Target practice, hunting, competitive shooting SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #147
How about research? HockeyMom Jul 2012 #150
They have no need for insurance as they are protected by law against civil lawsuits Kaleva Jul 2012 #116
How about an extra sales tax on guns to cover the cost of police, Larkspur Jul 2012 #82
There was a poll on DU2 SecularMotion Jul 2012 #87
nonsense, you can no more require insurance Riftaxe Jul 2012 #90
Do you get your gun FREE? HockeyMom Jul 2012 #113
very good idea KT2000 Jul 2012 #94
Which is why I wouldn't oppose mandatory insurance for the gun owner n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #148
Anyone who owns or rents a home and doesn't have a liability policy is either a fool, slackmaster Jul 2012 #98
Yep n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #118
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Liability Insurance for G...»Reply #42