Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pnwmom

(110,260 posts)
Wed Jan 24, 2018, 09:15 PM Jan 2018

"I'm a doctor. I want you to live and thrive. So I want semi-automatic guns banned." [View all]

And I do, too . . . so more 15 year olds can't get hold of handguns that can easily wound 16 of their classmates.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/10/04/im-a-doctor-i-want-you-to-live-and-thrive-so-i-want-semiautomatic-guns-banned/?utm_term=.a069cb1e52c8

The reality is this: A semiautomatic firearm — whether a long gun or a handgun — is a weapon of profound destructive capacity. Though semiautomatic (as opposed to automatic) guns require that the trigger be pulled once to discharge each bullet, they still allow a shooter with a quick finger to unleash an avalanche of bullets at a horrifying pace. When unloaded into a densely packed space, the resultant hail of bullets is just as capable of inflicting massive damage. Once fired, each of these projectiles then cuts a path through body, stretching adjacent tissues and so creating a path of destruction — the “wound cavity” — that can widen even more as the bullet tumbles and sometimes fragments, creating new smaller missiles each with their own trajectory; more bullets thus mean more punctured lungs, more shattered bones, more lacerated arteries, more severed spines.

In short, semiautomatic weapons are capable of inflicting egregious harm on a large number of people in a very short period, even when wielded by deranged users with no remarkable shooting skills. For instance, Adam Lanza, the perpetrator of the Sandy Hook massacre, used a semiautomatic rifle to fire 154 rounds and kill 26 individuals in under five minutes, as MSNBC reported; Seung-Hui Cho, responsible for the Virginia Tech massacre, fired 170 rounds with a pair of semiautomatic pistols in only nine minutes, leaving 30 dead, according to The Washington Post. To the extent that anything should be done about the types of guns available in America, we should end the sale (as others have previously argued and as the American College of Physicians suggested in a statement Monday) of all semiautomatic firearms, whether handgun or long gun.


The liberal obsession with “assault weapons” is thus a colossal mistake. The assault weapons ban identified such firearms by a host of largely cosmetic characteristics that were mostly irrelevant to their lethal potential and had no discernible effect on overall gun deaths. Collapsible stocks, pistol grips, bayonet mounts — who cares? Perhaps there is some utility to some of these features in combat settings, but when it comes to a mass shooter in a civilian environment, what matters more than anything is the sheer quantity of terrifying projectiles flying through crowded spaces at thousands of feet per second. To a lesser extent, things like the kinetic energy of a bullet also matter, but this can actually be higher in traditional hunting rifles than so-called assault weapons.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They will never be banned in this nation. maxsolomon Jan 2018 #1
Exactly and I agree PJMcK Jan 2018 #29
Post removed Post removed Jan 2018 #2
Uhhh... chumpchange Jan 2018 #5
No, he's unlikely to be an R. The NRA is a huge supporter of the R's. n/t pnwmom Jan 2018 #6
My Browning Auto Five is a semi- automatic Drahthaardogs Jan 2018 #3
Fine. Then limit semi-automatics to guns that can only hold 5 or 6 bullets. n/t pnwmom Jan 2018 #4
I was actually pretty happy with the ten round magazine Drahthaardogs Jan 2018 #10
Appeal to authority/emotion all in one. linuxman Jan 2018 #7
Alcohol in moderation usually doesn't hurt other people. Bullets shot into other people always do. pnwmom Jan 2018 #8
Alcohol and guns used responsibly don't hurt neither, you mean. linuxman Jan 2018 #9
So a firearm has never been used responsibly to hurt anyone? Ever? LanternWaste Jan 2018 #14
You really don't care about the deaths, do you? linuxman Jan 2018 #17
The flip side of that coin is that people want to live and thrive and aikoaiko Jan 2018 #11
Also because they are fun to shoot. maxsolomon Jan 2018 #12
Well, I said that's why they want them -- not what was more likely to happen aikoaiko Jan 2018 #20
Limiting magazine capacity make the most sense GulfCoast66 Jan 2018 #13
"I would happily trade my larger ones in " oneshooter Jan 2018 #15
The magazines come with the firearm. GulfCoast66 Jan 2018 #16
You just sounded a little hypocritical. oneshooter Jan 2018 #18
I understand GulfCoast66 Jan 2018 #19
In other words, you would not willingly oneshooter Jan 2018 #21
If we could enact a policy that would make Americans safer GulfCoast66 Jan 2018 #22
Destroying the high cap magazines most certainly will contribute to a safer environment as... Marengo Jan 2018 #24
I have no concerns about others taking me seriously GulfCoast66 Jan 2018 #27
You dont regard high cap magazines as a threat to public safety? Marengo Jan 2018 #28
Doesnt it seem that there would be a Lars39 Jan 2018 #23
I blame Raygun burnbaby Jan 2018 #25
I agree, but too many gunners love their lethal weapons and the power it gives them. Hoyt Jan 2018 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"I'm a doctor. I want you...