Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Magazine capacity limits [View all]Aerows
(39,961 posts)10. I don't think much of Harry Reid
His vote against the AWB was a stupid idea then, and it still is.
That said, an AWB wouldn't have stopped this asshole. He was determined to kill a bunch of people and did. Gasoline bombs tells you that. That doesn't mean we can't have some sensible policies against 100 round magazines unless you have a good reason.
Not that it would have helped in this situation, though. This dude is nuts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
yup as ive said before i would rathee have ten thirty round clips than a hundred
loli phabay
Jul 2012
#24
They were actually *lucky* Holmes went for the scary looking magazine
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#25
Can you think of any military that routinely issues 100 round magazines
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#61
we are lucky in some ways these guys dont know what they are doing and think extended mags
loli phabay
Jul 2012
#50
This is one of those issues that strikes me as a tempest in a teapot
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#13