Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Magazine capacity limits [View all]4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)18. For me I would say that in a free society
the onus for proof when discussing a ban of anything (guns, HFCS, salt, teletubbies, etc) ought to be entirely on the people demanding the ban.
So if you want something removed from society you should have to come up with a compelling argument for such a ban.
No one necessarily has to come up with a compelling argument to prevent such a ban.
Innocent until proven guilty, but for objects.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
yup as ive said before i would rathee have ten thirty round clips than a hundred
loli phabay
Jul 2012
#24
They were actually *lucky* Holmes went for the scary looking magazine
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#25
Can you think of any military that routinely issues 100 round magazines
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#61
we are lucky in some ways these guys dont know what they are doing and think extended mags
loli phabay
Jul 2012
#50
This is one of those issues that strikes me as a tempest in a teapot
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#13