Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Spike89

(1,569 posts)
19. Raise everything, but add "loopholes"
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 06:48 PM
Jul 2012

I'm aware that the term loophole is prejorative, but they are the carrot working with the stick (higher tax rates). We (progressives) certainly like to point out that tax rates were significantly higher in the past (90%+ under Ike) but ignore the reality that virtually no one actually paid that rate.

True progressive taxation allows businesses to grow and flourish because the money that is reinvested in labor and expansion would have otherwise been "lost" to taxes. The owners/shareholders can look at $1 billion in gross profits and choose between paying $900 million in taxes or reinvesting that money in payroll, (with generous tax credits for doing so). Get the balance right and the owner/shareholders get more of their $1 billion to keep, increase payroll (capacity), and probably still pay a fair share of federal taxes.

Follow the GOP model and there is no incentive for hiring anyone or improving factories and the uber-rich simply pocket the excess profit. It is a short term gain for them, but "short term" is relative and it will be their decendants that end up owning broken, under-funded businesses. That is one of the problems in the US right now - our tax code actually favors taking money out of a business over investing in that business.

In a sense, if the rates and policies were more progressive, some capital expenditures would and probably should result in lower effective tax rates. I don't want the billionaire's money, I just want that money to be used effectively. If it were, there'd be plenty for me and more than enough to maintain strong social programs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Both. louis-t Jul 2012 #1
"Unearned income" should be taxed at the same rate as earned income according to your bracket... rfranklin Jul 2012 #2
I would agree.. kentuck Jul 2012 #4
+1 denverbill Jul 2012 #10
Are you referring to unrealized capital gains, HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #15
Realized income... rfranklin Jul 2012 #20
Then I would agree with you. HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #22
Both. Zen Democrat Jul 2012 #3
Tax capital gains as income, on a progressive basis. PDJane Jul 2012 #5
+1, but.... HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #17
Both, but if I had to choose one lovemydog Jul 2012 #6
I want all types of income taxed at the same rate, so let's go with 39%. sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #7
Capital Gains Should Be Raised, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2012 #8
Agreed, and same for dividends. HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #18
"The total effective rate on capital gains would then be 25 percent." Make7 Jul 2012 #9
I would be interested in seeing the numbers joeglow3 Jul 2012 #11
Here is some food for thought the money people make from their IRAs doc03 Jul 2012 #12
Only for rich people. No sense raising my capital gains rate and all of the other average investors cbdo2007 Jul 2012 #13
Dividends and short term capital gains should be taxed same as wages. HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #14
There should be no capital gains rate... orwell Jul 2012 #16
Raise everything, but add "loopholes" Spike89 Jul 2012 #19
Both. David Zephyr Jul 2012 #21
Both. Income is income. Nt xchrom Jul 2012 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you rather see the ...»Reply #19