General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary responds to the NYT article [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Rage just drips from your posts - even though she no longer out there offending people with the outrage of thinking that she's more qualified than any man to be POTUS.
Was it that she actually won?
Was it her essay that women fantasize about being raped by three men, or having been called guilty of committing "environmental racism" by Paul Wellstone?
I mean, posting the same tweet twice in one thread isn't about trying to change the topic of the OP, right? That certainly doesn't reveal a need to for validation of your anger by trying to redirect the discussion, bringing in some information that doesn't seem to reflect well on the object of your anger.
See what I did there?
At least she acknowledged and did something about it.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/women-detail-sexual-harassment-clinton-sanders-campaigns-article-1.3641170