Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ron Paul Ups The Ante And Claims Sexual Harassment Shouldn’t Be Illegal [View all]DallasNE
(8,009 posts)39. Ron Paul Must Think It Is A Job Perk
For a manager to be able to bonk his secretary and fire her if she says no.
I'm sure the Paul bots will say that each State should determine the statute. That just sets up a situation where companies either set up their policy to adhear to the strictist State statute or develop a separate policy for each State that they operate in. Talk about a regulation burden, that is one for sure. Should they decide to go with a single policy could they then fire someone for violating the policy but not violating State law? And isn't that the delemma that States Rights advocates alway face because so many companies operate in all 50 States. I guess Paul doesn't believe in the Commerce Clause either.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ron Paul Ups The Ante And Claims Sexual Harassment Shouldn’t Be Illegal [View all]
PeaceNikki
Jan 2012
OP
He said that unless someone is physically assaulting 'you' like rape or something...
Spazito
Jan 2012
#7
the law already is that s/he must tell the person first that it bothers her/him
freeplessinseattle
Jan 2012
#96
It's also a highly privileged view, that only white males* really have the advantage of.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#33
Thanks for the quote, people aren't going to watch the video before defending him.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#32
It's obvious he would hide the real reason for firing her or passing her by for promotion,
julian09
Jan 2012
#87
How about telling an offensive racist joke?...Would that be okay with you too?
whathehell
Jan 2012
#36
Typical Southern "good ol' boy" who sees nothing wrong with sexual harassment.
Odin2005
Jan 2012
#21
Unbelievable! His turpitude is one thing - his supporters', must be the same
edgineered
Jan 2012
#13
I actually kind of envy the aPaulogists their evidently bottomless stores of denial
PeaceNikki
Jan 2012
#14
This is perfectly in line with his ideology, absolutely no surprise there. And people say the MSM...
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#31
Where are the people defending Paul's "swiftboating"? Surely there's an explaination?
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#43
He opposes military intervention in foreign wars, but not out of a sense of decency
PeaceNikki
Jan 2012
#68