Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should Nunes be indicted for obstructing a legal federal investigation? [View all]Gothmog
(178,599 posts)20. Republicans risk becoming accomplices in obstruction of justice
One can imagine that leaking this information was another way to head off errant action by the president. Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress have shown none of the courage Comey, Wray, McGahn, etc., demonstrated. With the exception of chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.), Republicans have demonstrated little inclination to dig deeply into the scandal or to restrain Trump. Two bipartisan bills seeking to hinder Trump from firing Mueller remain dormant. Democrats should insist these get an up-or-down vote.
Moreover, the antics of House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) should be seen in the context of Trumps multiple efforts to decapitate the FBI and the Russia investigation. Nunes is plowing the way cooking up conspiracy theories and propounding baseless allegations against Mueller and the FBI to predispose the public to accept Muellers firing. He is encouraging, almost baiting, Trump to fire Mueller. He is also assisting Trump by tainting the jury (the American people), if you will, to accept or even applaud Muellers firing. From the unmasking stunt to his latest memo, he has tried to distract from the Russian threat and discredit law enforcement.....
Nunes is in every sense cooperating colluding, you could say with the ongoing attempts to obstruct justice. It is indefensible.
Nevertheless, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) gives him free rein to keep this up. Neither of them have shown anything near the fidelity to the rule of law that Comey, McGahn, Wray and even Sessions (caveat: his lack of candor under oath to the Senate and participation in Comeys firing may also implicate him) have demonstrated. Neither Nunes nor Ryan seems to grasp that setting up barriers to constrain Trump is the right and constitutional thing to do. It also amounts to protecting Trump from Trump. You almost wonder if Ryan is giving Trump enough rope to hang himself
Moreover, the antics of House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) should be seen in the context of Trumps multiple efforts to decapitate the FBI and the Russia investigation. Nunes is plowing the way cooking up conspiracy theories and propounding baseless allegations against Mueller and the FBI to predispose the public to accept Muellers firing. He is encouraging, almost baiting, Trump to fire Mueller. He is also assisting Trump by tainting the jury (the American people), if you will, to accept or even applaud Muellers firing. From the unmasking stunt to his latest memo, he has tried to distract from the Russian threat and discredit law enforcement.....
Nunes is in every sense cooperating colluding, you could say with the ongoing attempts to obstruct justice. It is indefensible.
Nevertheless, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) gives him free rein to keep this up. Neither of them have shown anything near the fidelity to the rule of law that Comey, McGahn, Wray and even Sessions (caveat: his lack of candor under oath to the Senate and participation in Comeys firing may also implicate him) have demonstrated. Neither Nunes nor Ryan seems to grasp that setting up barriers to constrain Trump is the right and constitutional thing to do. It also amounts to protecting Trump from Trump. You almost wonder if Ryan is giving Trump enough rope to hang himself
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Should Nunes be indicted for obstructing a legal federal investigation? [View all]
kentuck
Jan 2018
OP
This is not the first time....Mueller has several he can go with and maybe more we dont know about.
sunonmars
Jan 2018
#4
Definitely yes, but if it doesnt happen, it would be sweet for him to lose his safe seat.
lkinwi
Jan 2018
#15
Can someone say for sure if this would be obstruction of justice by creating this false
Kirk Lover
Jan 2018
#22