Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(12,828 posts)

5. I believe it will have to go back to the senate for a revote

Tue Jan 30, 2018, 10:19 AM

Jan 2018

and you know the turtle will just slow it to death.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ooh ooh - I know! Nothing. dchill Jan 2018 #1

Inquirer minds wants to know too. Iliyah Jan 2018 #2

Absolutely nothing. nt DURHAM D Jan 2018 #3

If it passed with a veto proof majority.... vi5 Jan 2018 #4

I believe it will have to go back to the senate for a revote TexasProgresive Jan 2018 #5

Drumpf SIGNED it so it is law. BumRushDaShow Jan 2018 #8

I stand corrected. TexasProgresive Jan 2018 #9

It happened over the summer BumRushDaShow Jan 2018 #14

I thought there was something about it... vi5 Jan 2018 #15

Congress had a "dealine" to provide them the list of sanctions targets BumRushDaShow Jan 2018 #16

are you sure he signed it? bluestarone Jan 2018 #10

Yes. BumRushDaShow Jan 2018 #13

so WHERE ARE YOU CONGRESS???????????????????????????? bluestarone Jan 2018 #17

I posted this in your other thread BumRushDaShow Jan 2018 #18

Nothing! Dem_4_Life Jan 2018 #6

depends what the tea leaves say I imagine... beachbum bob Jan 2018 #7

Start a new investigation... mcar Jan 2018 #11