Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sanders Backs Out of Interview After Failing to Dictate Conditions [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)106. Thank you for that information.
I wasn't in the know about any of that...was working on the assumption that people were trying to personally discredit everybody in Bernie's family.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders Backs Out of Interview After Failing to Dictate Conditions [View all]
brooklynite
Jan 2018
OP
OMG....they cant ask about the current status of the college, the wood shop and the daughter?
BoneyardDem
Jan 2018
#11
I suppose being such a Bernie fan you may have ignored the Woodshop kerfuffle
BoneyardDem
Jan 2018
#83
Ms. Driscoll received approximately $500K from Burlington College over 4 years to teach woodworking.
George II
Jan 2018
#85
It may well be that he does not want to be asked who he favors in the election
karynnj
Jan 2018
#103
I'm not screaming. I do think that it's reasonable to investigate this land deal.
yardwork
Jan 2018
#118
Not a tabloid newspaper. No different from dozens or hundreds of local papers with websites.
George II
Jan 2018
#38
"No different from dozens or hundreds of local papers with websites."
Act_of_Reparation
Jan 2018
#54
Did you check the link? If you had you might not be as dismissive and sarcastic.
George II
Jan 2018
#68
You said "not from a dem". You're wrong. Not 'could be'. You're just flat-assed wrong.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2018
#140
Because you Guilt By Association'd us, very subtly, with RWNJ's, which is both a PPR
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2018
#144
That's some of the history. It's not the shitpost that incited the whole thing, but it's the
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2018
#148
If that was your only post, sure, but you went full on 'RWNJ in the next post.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2018
#152
Exactly like your accusation. Nothing to support it. Just an empty smear. Signifying nothing.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2018
#156
wow so defensive. I can't recall the name of a poster for a search, just recall the VERMIN shield
BoneyardDem
Jan 2018
#135
anyone reading this thread can see I acknowledged that a RWNJ could have borrowed your VERMIN shield
BoneyardDem
Jan 2018
#142
You wouldn't be the first poster on DU to try and make that image into something that it's not.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2018
#145
Again, I think you need to re-read my post, because you have completely misunderstood it.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2018
#149
no. What makes you establishment is if you avoid the issues that would undercut said establishment.
JCanete
Jan 2018
#60
No, what makes you establishment is to be an old white male in congress for decades.
Ninsianna
Jan 2018
#71
They've been covering this local story for years now, it's not fawning and they
Ninsianna
Jan 2018
#76
That's bullshit. There is no politician that doesn't control what they talk about in an interview
JCanete
Jan 2018
#78
Yes, let's throw the most popular politician among Democrats under the bus! Good idea!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2018
#27
ahhh pressing that popularity line? And yes, truth is difficult to state here without a hide
BoneyardDem
Jan 2018
#28
How is saying he's "establishment" throwing him under the bus? How is that term not true?
George II
Jan 2018
#39
I love that "most popular" moniker that has been assigned to him based on highly flawed.....
George II
Jan 2018
#59
that's a stupid definition. Sorry to be blunt, but you are suggesting that you cannot rail against
JCanete
Jan 2018
#61
All of that assumes that principled influence is welcome in some of these dealings. It assumes that
JCanete
Jan 2018
#62
I just updated my post before your response which may offer more clarity to what I was saying, but
JCanete
Jan 2018
#69
What you say is fine, but remember he had no qualms about talking about non-political issues..
George II
Jan 2018
#24
I can't blame him. He works like hell for the people of Vermont and he only wants to discuss issues.
Vinca
Jan 2018
#45
Perhaps the people of Vermont think that the issues he and his wife were involved
Ninsianna
Jan 2018
#52
Without rehashing the last primary, it would be nice if we would all refrain from trashing either
Vinca
Jan 2018
#77
Bernie doesn't value transparency as much as he claims to. This is in line with him
pnwmom
Jan 2018
#104