Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A couple of years ago there was a DU poll [View all]musicblind
(4,563 posts)44. The rules were not changed to silence them. DU has ALWAYS required it's members
to fully back the Democratic nominee once the primary process ends.
If they could not do that, in the face of a potential Trump Presidency, then they do not deserve the right to post here.
Please, let's not pretend that anyone who can work to enable someone like Donald Trump, explicitly or tacitly, can still be a good person.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kucinich got about the same for 2004 and i think edwards and kucinich had a lot more
JI7
Jan 2018
#8
Yup, President Sanders was the most popular, right after President Kucinich, and President Edwards!
FSogol
Jan 2018
#21
+1. Disrupters on both sides were banned. No one was banned for simply supporting Bernie.
FSogol
Jan 2018
#31
KTM, I spent 8 years hiding out in the BOG. President Obama had many admireres here...
Hekate
Jan 2018
#33
The rules were not changed to silence them. DU has ALWAYS required it's members
musicblind
Jan 2018
#44
Is there a point to this thread other than to stir the pot? This is a time when Democrats need to
MelissaB
Jan 2018
#32