General Discussion

Response to kentuck (Original post)

Post removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In regards to Trump missing sanctions deadline, Chuck Schumer had this to say: [View all] kentuck Jan 2018 OP

Next Time He'll Really Let Drumpf Have It! SoCalMusicLover Jan 2018 #1

My thoughts exactly--that sternly worded letter is on its way! nt shanny Jan 2018 #2

Yep. Squinch Jan 2018 #10

So what are the options that he is missing? (nt) ehrnst Jan 2018 #41

His valid alternatives being precisely what? LanternWaste Jan 2018 #47

Why did they just vote to let him spy on us? bahrbearian Jan 2018 #11

What vote is that? (nt) ehrnst Jan 2018 #37

This bahrbearian Jan 2018 #38

How does that equate with Schumer "voting to allow him to spy" on us? ehrnst Jan 2018 #40

Some Resistance, bahrbearian Jan 2018 #42

Are you being spied on right now? ehrnst Jan 2018 #58

I detect a bit of sarcasm. triron Jan 2018 #15

I think a review of government 101 might be handy. ehrnst Jan 2018 #36

Way easier to sit back and criticize especially if you dont really know anything about it. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #53

Lotta armchair quarterbacking going on. ehrnst Jan 2018 #55

Such a civilized answer, and I hope others will appreciate Hortensis Jan 2018 #62

This is mostly due to being in the minority. AFAIK it is Congress who napi21 Jan 2018 #65

Tell us, please, what the Dems can do about it mcar Jan 2018 #66

Hah! He showed them who's boss! smirkymonkey Jan 2018 #77

You mean like this? ehrnst Feb 2018 #87

Why isn't anyone calling his actions treason yet? Sanity Claws Jan 2018 #3

Post removed Post removed Jan 2018 #7

There 's not a lot of foot-stomping, is there? PJMcK Jan 2018 #27

Damned right we're "ineffectual." Hortensis Jan 2018 #63

Yes Joediss Jan 2018 #28

McCaskill said it was a constitutional crisis. Does that count? ehrnst Jan 2018 #30

Getting close but not there yet Sanity Claws Jan 2018 #31

Even with the character limit.... ehrnst Jan 2018 #33

When do we start calling Trump an agent of Russia? Tatiana Jan 2018 #4

I mean this seriously: Eyeball_Kid Jan 2018 #17

Thanks! Great idea. triron Jan 2018 #19

And will you be mad if they don't? (nt) ehrnst Jan 2018 #59

Well, Russia's already doing it... Saviolo Jan 2018 #25

That will go over like Kelleyanne saying that Obama was spying through microwaves. ehrnst Jan 2018 #51

Fine, everyone just constantly refer to him as Putin's Gopher ... extra benefit that he'll hate that mr_lebowski Jan 2018 #85

Yeah, those insults are totally going to get things done. ehrnst Jan 2018 #86

How is he getting away with this ? CentralMass Jan 2018 #5

Money. Eyeball_Kid Jan 2018 #18

Republicans Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2018 #43

GOP control of the House and Senate, along with the Oval Office ehrnst Jan 2018 #52

Post removed Post removed Jan 2018 #6

I'll give you such a pinch! JDC Jan 2018 #8

That's harrassment ProudLib72 Jan 2018 #9

Yeah, that press conference yesterday ehrnst Jan 2018 #54

Some people don't seem to understand how governmentin' works mcar Jan 2018 #67

Yeah that's it. It's not a noticeable lack of charisma or energy. JDC Jan 2018 #78

I do not give one s&it about "charisma" mcar Jan 2018 #80

Nobody's said anything about socializing. We are talking about nessaging JDC Jan 2018 #82

It's a very clear statement. Cha Jan 2018 #12

+1 Lucinda Jan 2018 #13

Aloha, Lucinda.. good to see you! Cha Jan 2018 #14

It's all hat, is what it is. shanny Jan 2018 #23

What cattle are available? What option is he failing to take? ehrnst Jan 2018 #44

You mean Plucketeer Jan 2018 #49

Oh, you think he's not yelling enough on the teevee. ehrnst Jan 2018 #50

When does he take to the internet? Plucketeer Jan 2018 #60

Oh, so NOW you say that he's not on a FB live feed enough... ehrnst Jan 2018 #61

Mother Jones. For chrisake. SleeplessinSoCal Jan 2018 #16

Yea, "seems", huh? theaocp Jan 2018 #20

What options are available that they are not taking? ehrnst Jan 2018 #45

Continual offense and not mealy-mouthed tut-tutting. theaocp Jan 2018 #64

It's like D rump is violating his oath of office. Like he foreswore himself when he took the oath. Mc Mike Jan 2018 #21

Is that last line supposed to be facetious? BobTheSubgenius Jan 2018 #22

Post removed Post removed Jan 2018 #24

The ACA wasn't "spineless." ehrnst Jan 2018 #46

He's planning a state dinner for Putin dalton99a Jan 2018 #26

Who is planning a state dinner for Putin? (nt) ehrnst Jan 2018 #48

Why when trump commits treason and when our party leader stands up to him it is the Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #29

Tradition is why Eliot - DU Tradition The Polack MSgt Jan 2018 #32

I like your answer better. I was going to laugh now with an emoji Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #34

On. The. Nose. ehrnst Jan 2018 #35

+10000 brer cat Jan 2018 #39

As said. Like pundit rules for covering Hillary. Hortensis Jan 2018 #57

Followed by laments that we aren't coming together mcar Jan 2018 #69

I've been wondering this for a decade mcar Jan 2018 #68

Hey! Hey! John Fante Jan 2018 #56

Nicely? ehrnst Jan 2018 #72

Pretty weak, but something is better than nothing, I guess. nt Honeycombe8 Jan 2018 #70

In what way is this "weak?" ehrnst Jan 2018 #71

I view it as this. Honeycombe8 Jan 2018 #73

Again... what would have been a "strong" alternative? ehrnst Jan 2018 #74

The other statements I cited as stronger. Using direct, strong words. Honeycombe8 Jan 2018 #75

Oh, he didn't use the word "thug" so that's "weak." ehrnst Jan 2018 #76

Clear, direct language. Bold, strong words that say clearly what happened... Honeycombe8 Jan 2018 #79

By "typical" you mean "pretty weak." ehrnst Jan 2018 #81

You need to focus on something... Honeycombe8 Jan 2018 #83

Not going to back up your statements when ehrnst Jan 2018 #84