Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Wed Jan 31, 2018, 02:31 PM Jan 2018

Even if Trump is blatantly ignoring the Russia sanctions law, theres not a lot Congress can do [View all]

Last edited Wed Jan 31, 2018, 03:05 PM - Edit history (2)

The bashing of Dem leaders here on DU for "NOT DOING SOMETHING!!!!" should be tempered with and understanding of what the actual options are, especially for a party in the minority.

“I wouldn't necessarily say Congress is out of options,” said Cornell law professor Josh Chafetz, who recently wrote a book on Congress's tools for checking the White House. “I would say that, with Republicans controlling both chambers, it's less likely to utilize certain options.”

So what are those unlikely options? Let's run them down:

Congress could sue the president for allegedly breaking the law, but legal experts said courts tend to side with the executive branch on questions such as these. The sanctions law says Trump can avoid implementing them if he proves that Russia has made significant efforts to stop hacking into U.S. elections systems. It's not clear whether he's done that behind the scenes and the public just doesn't know about it.
........................................
Congress's main power is the power of the purse. Lawmakers could try to withhold funding from the State Department until it implements the sanctions. But that's only slightly less risky than suing the president, because Congress could get blamed for handicapping U.S. diplomats. Plus, Congress has struggled since September to pass any budget, so this might be an empty threat.

The Senate could hold up judicial nominees, but that's also unlikely. The speedy rate at which Trump has nominated conservative judges and at which Senate Republicans have subsequently approved them was one of the party's potentially most lasting (if under-the-radar) accomplishments in 2017.

Congress could hold hearings designed to criticize and even embarrass the Trump administration about this decision. Consider it Congress's version of browbeating, Chafetz said. If Congress does anything at all, this is the likeliest option, and it could at least help lawmakers highlight their frustration with Trump's inaction.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/30/even-if-trump-is-blatantly-ignoring-the-russia-sanctions-law-theres-not-a-lot-congress-can-do-about-it/
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress can impeach him for obstruction of justice and abuse of power YessirAtsaFact Jan 2018 #1
You think that a GOP congress is going to do that? You have to have a majority to do that. ehrnst Jan 2018 #2
I said they can-I didnt say they will YessirAtsaFact Jan 2018 #3
Democrats *can* impeach him? I don't think you understand what is required to impeach... ehrnst Jan 2018 #6
The OP is talking about Congress, not just Democrats YessirAtsaFact Jan 2018 #10
That's the Constitutional remedy for this sort of thing. Dave Starsky Jan 2018 #11
That would require GOP to get on board if they are the majority, wouldn't it? ehrnst Jan 2018 #14
Not bloody likely. Dave Starsky Jan 2018 #20
OK, then without the GOP onboard, there isn't a constitutional remedy no matter how many ehrnst Jan 2018 #28
At Least All Dems Should Be in Front Of Microphones & ..... global1 Jan 2018 #25
You mean like Schumer? And McCaskill? And Schiff? ehrnst Jan 2018 #29
You mean like this? ehrnst Jan 2018 #34
I see Dems in front of mikes every day mcar Jan 2018 #43
Yeah, "not a lot Congress can do" is BS. lagomorph777 Jan 2018 #42
But if it is done as a quid pro quo... kentuck Jan 2018 #4
What would be done as a quid pro quo? ehrnst Jan 2018 #8
This is what the whole Russian investigation is about... kentuck Jan 2018 #18
From the article: ehrnst Jan 2018 #21
oh man i disagree here bluestarone Jan 2018 #5
Please list their options. Plenty of space below. ehrnst Jan 2018 #12
onlyn 2 that i care about bluestarone Jan 2018 #17
Again, you think that the GOP is going to impeach? They are the majority. ehrnst Jan 2018 #22
again i said COULD bluestarone Jan 2018 #24
You "could" what? ehrnst Jan 2018 #30
It can be the eighty-eighth article of impeachment... Orsino Jan 2018 #7
You mean when we have a majority? ehrnst Jan 2018 #9
Hell, I wouldn't hold my breath... Orsino Jan 2018 #13
Why? Do you think Dems won't use their majority? ehrnst Jan 2018 #15
It will depend on how big the majority is... Orsino Jan 2018 #16
You think Dem leaders won't work to make Trump accountable if they are the majority? ehrnst Jan 2018 #26
I recommended aginst holding one's breath. Orsino Jan 2018 #32
"By definition a slow process." ehrnst Jan 2018 #33
My revenge fantasies mostly key on criminal proceedings. Orsino Jan 2018 #35
Oh, I have some revenge fantasies. ehrnst Jan 2018 #36
Working to make Trump accountable mcar Jan 2018 #44
This Is Just Another Instance Where We Let Trump Off The Hook.... global1 Jan 2018 #19
How have we "let Trump off the hook?" What was available to get him "on the hook?" ehrnst Jan 2018 #27
Some people need visuals. brer cat Jan 2018 #23
Yes, that would be completely different. ehrnst Jan 2018 #31
More like "not a lot Congress *wants* to do about it. no_hypocrisy Jan 2018 #37
The norms are gone, folks. The mad Captain Queeg is at the helm procon Jan 2018 #38
The Dems could run this year on this issue, and they will Johonny Jan 2018 #39
Let's all work our ass off to retake the House and then the Senate. Ligyron Jan 2018 #40
Hasn't McConnell taken away Ds ability to place holds on judicial noms? mcar Jan 2018 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Even if Trump is blatantl...