General Discussion

TheFrenchRazor

(2,116 posts)

42. this. in the final analysis, hand-counting is the gold standard. nt

Reply to rtracey (Reply #24)

Wed Jan 31, 2018, 09:04 PM

Jan 2018

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Watch How insanely easy it is to hack US voting machines" [View all] triron Jan 2018 OP

yep, that's exactly what we're supposed to believe; and GOP chose not to do it either... NOT. nt TheFrenchRazor Jan 2018 #1

I bet they teamed up to do it! triron Jan 2018 #2

The Sequoia has already been proven to have recorded massive amounts of Trump votes. sarah FAILIN Jan 2018 #3

You have a reference for that? Would be nice to collect all triron Jan 2018 #4

It was posted here some time back sarah FAILIN Jan 2018 #6

It actually doesn't appear to be that easy at all. Captain Stern Jan 2018 #5

Are you new in town? sarah FAILIN Jan 2018 #7

The video shows hackers specifically hacking individual voting machines. Captain Stern Jan 2018 #9

Trump is not our President. sarah FAILIN Jan 2018 #11

Cool. I look forward to seeing your proof if/when you get it. nt. Captain Stern Jan 2018 #15

You don't understand the hack mythology Jan 2018 #20

how can we find evidence when no one looks? questionseverything Jan 2018 #36

Agree, Captain. It's not as easy as they make it, and there is no evidence it happened in 2016 Hoyt Jan 2018 #10

Why then this? I suppose you are more an expert than this scholar. triron Jan 2018 #21

Another it COULD happen. No evidence it did happen. Hoyt Jan 2018 #27

I refer also to posts 19 and 23. triron Jan 2018 #30

#23 says nothing. I didnt read 19 because I saw the link about gerrymandering, which has absolutely Hoyt Jan 2018 #32

Biggest reason for lack of evidence is nobody looked. triron Jan 2018 #33

Never said it was secure. We are way behind in that respect. But, thats not why we lost. Hoyt Jan 2018 #34

when was there a meaningful, comprehensive investigation that would obtain this evidence? never, TheFrenchRazor Jan 2018 #40

Im not OK sounding like a beat boxer saying it was rigged. We lost, we could Hoyt Jan 2018 #44

"we can add fake voters, subtract voters from the voter record, vote multiple times..." triron Jan 2018 #8

Exactly. sarah FAILIN Jan 2018 #12

And we will always have our naysayers. triron Jan 2018 #13

Some don't want to consider the possibility themselves sarah FAILIN Jan 2018 #14

A good resource for election system corruption triron Jan 2018 #16

A few more, assorted RandomAccess Jan 2018 #19

I really find the testimony by Halderman to be an eye opener. triron Jan 2018 #23

I'm beginning to think that both the MSM and our politicians RandomAccess Jan 2018 #25

IMO, paper receipts are useless. we need all paper ballots, all hand-counted, all the time. nt TheFrenchRazor Jan 2018 #41

100% agree RandomAccess Jan 2018 #45

Why bother? kwijybo Jan 2018 #17

Perhaps that's exactly what they did. triron Jan 2018 #18

all those tow-headed, fresh faced youngsters with funny accents BamaRefugee Jan 2018 #22

thats why rtracey Jan 2018 #24

this. in the final analysis, hand-counting is the gold standard. nt TheFrenchRazor Jan 2018 #42

I observed INSIDE a precinct in Los Angeles during the Democratic primary. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #26

There should always be a printed paper trail JohnnyRingo Jan 2018 #28

what proves that the receipt and the vote recorded in the machine are the same? that too is hackable TheFrenchRazor Jan 2018 #43

You get to see the printed paper as the vote is cast JohnnyRingo Feb 2018 #46

Senseless confusion... TomVilmer Jan 2018 #29

What are you talking about? There has been no suggestion that anything like this happened. triron Jan 2018 #31

- except a lot of the answers... TomVilmer Jan 2018 #35

personally i think the fix is ussually done at the reporting level questionseverything Jan 2018 #37

kick for visibility triron Jan 2018 #38

knr triron Jan 2018 #39