Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Progressive dog

(7,593 posts)
17. Medicare covers about 1/6 of the population
Thu Feb 1, 2018, 11:00 AM
Feb 2018

and when started, there were fewer people over 65. As far as people on Medicare, it's pretty much the same as any health insurance, with you paying monthly for part B if you choose to have more than "in hospital" coverage, finding a way to pay the 20% of part B costs and you buying a separate drug plan with co-pays, a doughnut hole, and perhaps a deductible. Of course the drug plan will have a formulary and won't pay for all FDA approved drugs. You have to re-up to drugs and/or advantage plans each year. Most change formularies and patient costs each year.
Then there are dental costs (you have to buy coverage), vision (you have to buy coverage), long term care where you go broke first-then you might get medicaid.
This is at a time when you usually need more healthcare, when your income has decreased, when it is certain that you are not as physically and maybe mentally as capable as you were. That's what you claim is relatively simple.
BTW I am one of those people on medicare and I paid into the system for over 40 years (and my employers matched those payments) so that I would have some affordable health coverage when I retired.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Vouchers! Gabi Hayes Jan 2018 #1
'Medicare For All' works for me! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2018 #2
I don't believe employer paid insurance was very common until several years later MichMan Jan 2018 #3
It's ironic too, because a lot of people don't realize how much it costs their employer yurbud Jan 2018 #5
FDR chose not to tie Progressive dog Jan 2018 #4
ACA is assaultable because it is a complex incremental program yurbud Jan 2018 #6
Social Security had an incremental Progressive dog Jan 2018 #9
I'm not saying it should have been done up front, but it would have been popular at any time yurbud Jan 2018 #10
Upending over 1/6 of the economy, Progressive dog Jan 2018 #12
I don't think anyone in Washington is thinking of the low level claims processors yurbud Feb 2018 #19
Because the bailout was one time and saved the economy Progressive dog Feb 2018 #20
Medicare is pretty complex Progressive dog Jan 2018 #15
For people ON Medicare, it is relatively simple yurbud Feb 2018 #16
Medicare covers about 1/6 of the population Progressive dog Feb 2018 #17
the 20%, donut holes and the like are the monkey wrenches I mentioned yurbud Feb 2018 #18
So is Social Security. Ken Burch Jan 2018 #7
Social Security is still in business Progressive dog Jan 2018 #8
Not quite accurate. LanternWaste Jan 2018 #13
FDR did not tie medical to social security-that is a fact Progressive dog Jan 2018 #14
People were all for govt programs until civil rights when non whites would benefit JI7 Jan 2018 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»1944 poll: Would you rath...»Reply #17