Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flying_wahini

(8,281 posts)
13. But then Carter/Trump team was under surveillance since Oct '16 then the $$ Putin distributed
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 10:15 AM
Feb 2018

Via the NRA donations would be enough to hang them all. And the wiretapping goes along with it.
Ryan/McConnell knew (or surmised) where the $ was coming from and didn't declare it. Devin was personally responsible for passing out lots more CASH (not as easily traced) & other NRA 'checks'were donated to campaigns.
To me this explains why Comey went after Hillary because if he didn't the Repugs would guess he was tracking them. In the end Comey didn't want to out HRC because it would blow his cover that he was onto the Putin/Trump connections. Also Comey thought HRC was going to win by a landslide and it wouldn't matter, anyway. I don't think Comey ever thought she could lose it.

IMO I believe ALL those meeting were taped. ALL OF THEM.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

After yesterday's fiasco C_U_L8R Feb 2018 #1
It kinda looks like maybe. Ryan is sticking his neck out as far as I'm concerned...He Kirk Lover Feb 2018 #18
Oh I hope there is incriminating evidence. LiberalFighter Feb 2018 #21
The only explanation I can think of is that... dchill Feb 2018 #2
In Ryan's case I could only imagine any Putin ties would be campaign contributions, whereas in this OnDoutside Feb 2018 #3
I'm thinking campaign contributions that were... dchill Feb 2018 #5
That looks entirely likely but I suspect they could say they accepted the money from a US OnDoutside Feb 2018 #7
follow the money as Rachel says. triron Feb 2018 #15
this.... Sancho Feb 2018 #8
Definitely. It's worth remembering that even Never Trump Republicans were shocked when the OnDoutside Feb 2018 #10
also remember when Nunes was first doing the run around back and forth with the White House JI7 Feb 2018 #4
That's a great point, I'd forgotten that. OnDoutside Feb 2018 #6
Maybe Rachel ignores Nunes because he's just carrying frump's water. lindysalsagal Feb 2018 #9
It's not Nunes she ignored, it's the tying the link from Page being under surveillance to Page OnDoutside Feb 2018 #11
Rachel did pretty much explain Devin's obstruction, Progressive dog Feb 2018 #12
Obstruction by Nunes yes, but it's more than that. It was Rachel who OnDoutside Feb 2018 #16
The Page interview with Hayes Progressive dog Feb 2018 #19
But then Carter/Trump team was under surveillance since Oct '16 then the $$ Putin distributed flying_wahini Feb 2018 #13
But they may not have known Carter was under continuous FISA warrants until much later. OnDoutside Feb 2018 #14
Ohhhh Yes! LiberalFighter Feb 2018 #22
Lawrence O'Donnell: "Why Did He Do It?" Tatiana Feb 2018 #17
Ryan's Role hydrolastic Feb 2018 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has Rachel given a possib...»Reply #13