Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Black Lives Matter: Philadelphia Super Bowl Riots Reaction Glaring Example of White Privilege [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)73. And you are missing the point that a unpermitted block party is different from a permitted one
Police weren't going to "break up a mass of humanity" which was assembled pursuant to the city closing the streets specifically for the purpose of holding that assembly.
Yes they did indeed break it up later in the night after the allotted time, and yes they did make arrests of people in that assembly who were out of order. More arrests are likely to follow as well.
You and others here seem to think that these people gathered in these places spontaneously, as in a civil disturbance. That's not what was going on in Philly at all. There were designated places for "masses of humanity" to assemble throughout the town. So OF COURSE police weren't breaking up the crowds.
Police don't break up the crowd in Times Square during New Year's for the simple reason that is WHERE PEOPLE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE.
The bad behavior that is being posted as somehow representative occurred at places and moments which were difficult to get to, but your point that the "police aren't going to try to break up a mass of humanity" assembled in a place where they were directed to go BY THE POLICE AND THE CITY, is just silly.
Yeah, if a hundred people gather on Broad Street under circumstances where the street has not been closed for that purpose, sure, the police are going to break it up.
But it seems that nobody outside of Philadelphia understands that there were designated party zones throughout the city, which were cordoned off for the purpose of whooping it up generally, and that, naturally, persons of all races and genders got out of control on the fringes of some of them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
137 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Black Lives Matter: Philadelphia Super Bowl Riots Reaction Glaring Example of White Privilege [View all]
malaise
Feb 2018
OP
I wish white leaders would speak out about the destruction in their community and the cultural
WhiskeyGrinder
Feb 2018
#2
The notion that the crowds in Philadelphia were exclusively one race or another is ridiculous
jberryhill
Feb 2018
#23
When black folk run amok, damage property, it's a "riot." When white folk do it, it's "homecoming."
EffieBlack
Feb 2018
#97
turned over cars set fires smashed Macys windows ...what makes a riot then??Anger ?so every protest?
lunasun
Feb 2018
#105
And you are missing the point that a unpermitted block party is different from a permitted one
jberryhill
Feb 2018
#73
Flipping cars, breaking storefronts and windows, trashing traffic lights, crowds of drunks eating
WhiskeyGrinder
Feb 2018
#7
Wait it was done by white people? Totally just a victory celebration! /sarc
ExciteBike66
Feb 2018
#8
Bottles thrown at cops, the volume of calls overwhelming response, fires...
WhiskeyGrinder
Feb 2018
#13
Community? I would bet the owner and employees of that store are not feeling a great sense of
Tipperary
Feb 2018
#129
"The relative degree of general mayhem was lower than a normal night in Philadelphia."
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2018
#27
I call it illegal behavior but not indicative of a "riot" when it concerns only 4 or 5 people out
whathehell
Feb 2018
#124
The other weird thing is how people outside of Philly somehow think the crowds were all white
jberryhill
Feb 2018
#12
And the desire to move the narrative away from the OPs point as quickly as possible
LanternWaste
Feb 2018
#34
I cant believe the denial I am reading in this thread, no wait, I can, sigh.
Eliot Rosewater
Feb 2018
#76
How many women were tearing down lamp posts? I'd love to know. Bet there were none.
YOHABLO
Feb 2018
#29
I would usually be inclined to agree and do think this warrents a serious discussion
randr
Feb 2018
#41
Have you ever been to Philadelphia? Philadelphia has as many African Americans as white people
stevenleser
Feb 2018
#45
I've been posting on fb since the win, that if they were black, they'd be dead.
ancianita
Feb 2018
#46
It's not missing. It's not assumed either way. You are injecting 3 assumptions
stevenleser
Feb 2018
#108
Apparently, someone is bothered by a city demonstrating diverse unity in celebration
jberryhill
Feb 2018
#55
I thought they might be concerned about the co-opting of MLK's message by big business.
jalan48
Feb 2018
#101
They can't, nor should they be expected to, comment on every single instance of screwed up sh!t that
EffieBlack
Feb 2018
#102
that gathering place was a quite a culmination of folks of many backgrounds!
jberryhill
Feb 2018
#79
As an African American I get there's racism but we need voters to get rid of the current
underthematrix
Feb 2018
#78
You're right - it's about the underlying reason for the demonstration, not the demonstration itself
EffieBlack
Feb 2018
#100
So if the people committing the sports disturbance were 95% black there would be no
uponit7771
Feb 2018
#109
Then I'll take the answer as no, if the crowd was 95% black then they wouldn't get treated
uponit7771
Feb 2018
#135