Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gollygee

(22,336 posts)

10. I don't understand what that should even matter

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Wed Jul 25, 2012, 01:47 PM

Jul 2012

If Zimmerman got out of his car and chased him down for no good reason and after being told by the police disptacher not to, then I don't see why he should have had a right to shoot Trayvon Martin just because he had been losing a fight resulting from his inappropriate behavior.

But even so, I doubt a young skinny kid could take down a guy that big very easily. Zimmerman is a bully and was probably in full bully role the whole time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Prosecutors release names of 6 'secret' witnesses in George Zimmerman case [View all] Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 OP

if it was dark, how can they distinguish colors, esp. red? broiles Jul 2012 #1

I'm trying to figure out how he's considered the prosecutor's witness. Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 #3

Remember, there were some witnesses that the cops Solomon Jul 2012 #6

the kid's mother made that exact claim.. frylock Jul 2012 #9

Good catch, everybody is colorblind in the dark slampoet Jul 2012 #12

There is often still neighborhood lighting around. Lex Jul 2012 #14

Question: How close to Trayvon was Zimmerman's gun when it went off? Forensics 1monster Jul 2012 #2

The forensic report says the wound and powder tattooing are consistent with "intermediate range" slackmaster Jul 2012 #8

Isn't it considered perjury if the names of witnesses are released before the trial? Initech Jul 2012 #4

Florida has the most open public records laws. Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 #5

No, perjury is for Lying under oath. Bandit Jul 2012 #11

If I was being stalked by some nut, I would sure put them on the ground - if I could. I would patricia92243 Jul 2012 #7

I don't understand what that should even matter gollygee Jul 2012 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author Lex Jul 2012 #13