General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Progressives storm Democratic primaries [View all]Sophia4
(3,515 posts)We should target seats of Republicans.
But if in an area with Democratic incumbents, someone wants to run in the primary against the incumbent, in my view that is great.
We are supposed to be a democracy. Our election system allows us to change with the times. If voters want to elect a candidate who is not an incumbent, great. That's what democracy is about.
No one should EVER, EVER, EVER discourage anyone from running for office. Primaries are an important part of what our democratic system is about. It is good for incumbents whether Republican or Democratic to know they will have to answer to voters for their decisions, their votes, their policies in the primaries.
Democrats have lost seats at all levels of government. It may be time for renewal. I loved Barbara Boxer. I think I voted for her in her first Senate election if I remember correctly. But it was time for a new voice, and Kamala Harris is great. I would like to see several people challenge Dianne Feinstein this year. I think Feinstein would probably win, but it would be a good opportunity for voters to see new, potential future candidates in a primary, and it would be a good experience for them to run. Besides, Feinstein needs to face a challenge and learn the truth from voters about what they think of her performance in office.
Elected officials and other government workers are the employees of the people. They should be challenged to answer for their votes and decisions frequently. That's what primaries are for.
Primaries are an important part of the democratic process.