Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I hope James Holmes will at least put a stake through the argument [View all]hack89
(39,181 posts)55. Which AWB - the old one or the one they are trying to pass? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would that also apply to first time armed robbers or home invaders who stole the gun
Brisket
Jul 2012
#10
What is there, if anything, about the shooter's purchases that would have set red flags off?
X_Digger
Jul 2012
#24
So the first time after this magical pattern match is implemented, when I purchase ammo online..
X_Digger
Jul 2012
#101
The annual homicide number remained steady at around 10,000 murders for a decade. n/t
ellisonz
Jul 2012
#90
I think I get it, finally! The solution is to imprision everyone (who might become a criminal)
Brisket
Jul 2012
#11
We could at least have a system that red flags people who go on buying sprees.
reformist2
Jul 2012
#15
How exactly would your spree detector function? If you have a working model, you should
Brisket
Jul 2012
#18
That'd be because the vast, overhwelming majority of purchases *are* for recreation/protection.
Posteritatis
Jul 2012
#37
Hey, that term may be misleading, but at least it's not so egregiously dishonest. Good on ya. n/t
NewMoonTherian
Jul 2012
#92
And the 100 round , shot per second , magazine is for the targets or the "smalL game" ? Nt
pkdu
Jul 2012
#80
You can ask until you're blue in the face how the gun-banners can guarantee that no criminals
Brisket
Jul 2012
#23
That's because anyone who used an outlawed gun would then be a criminal, by definition.
pnwmom
Jul 2012
#28
We're not really going to talk about cracking down on smoke bombs now, are we?
NewMoonTherian
Jul 2012
#65