Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I hope James Holmes will at least put a stake through the argument [View all]SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)57. Not necessarily
He couldn't have bought the AR-15 legally, but do you think someone that is planning a mass killing is going to hesitate to obtain the same weapon illegally?
It's fantasy to believe that outlawing guns will stop mass killings. Someone that is intent on such a massacre isn't going to hesitate to get what he needs to do so, even if he has to do it illegally.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would that also apply to first time armed robbers or home invaders who stole the gun
Brisket
Jul 2012
#10
What is there, if anything, about the shooter's purchases that would have set red flags off?
X_Digger
Jul 2012
#24
So the first time after this magical pattern match is implemented, when I purchase ammo online..
X_Digger
Jul 2012
#101
The annual homicide number remained steady at around 10,000 murders for a decade. n/t
ellisonz
Jul 2012
#90
I think I get it, finally! The solution is to imprision everyone (who might become a criminal)
Brisket
Jul 2012
#11
We could at least have a system that red flags people who go on buying sprees.
reformist2
Jul 2012
#15
How exactly would your spree detector function? If you have a working model, you should
Brisket
Jul 2012
#18
That'd be because the vast, overhwelming majority of purchases *are* for recreation/protection.
Posteritatis
Jul 2012
#37
Hey, that term may be misleading, but at least it's not so egregiously dishonest. Good on ya. n/t
NewMoonTherian
Jul 2012
#92
And the 100 round , shot per second , magazine is for the targets or the "smalL game" ? Nt
pkdu
Jul 2012
#80
You can ask until you're blue in the face how the gun-banners can guarantee that no criminals
Brisket
Jul 2012
#23
That's because anyone who used an outlawed gun would then be a criminal, by definition.
pnwmom
Jul 2012
#28
We're not really going to talk about cracking down on smoke bombs now, are we?
NewMoonTherian
Jul 2012
#65